My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN021803
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN021803
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
3/7/2003 3:49:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN021803
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
strategy is for Vineyard. Is it to reduce cut-through traffic or is to make the road more efficient <br />and to push the traffic through better. <br /> <br /> Dave Ash, 615 Orofino Court, urged Council to reduce Vineyard to two lanes. Speeds <br />have continued to go up over the years and he felt the only way to reduce speed is to reduce it to <br />two lanes. <br /> <br /> Iyad Natour, 701 Montevino Drive, supported reducing Vineyard to two lanes. He <br />objected to a traffic signal at Montevino and Vineyard. He felt most of the traffic coming <br />through Vineyard is cut-through traffic with one one-third coming from Ruby Hill. He asked <br />Council to delay installing the signal at Montevino until the effect of the signal at Ruby Hill is <br />known. <br /> <br /> Tom Philippe, 3239 Chardonnay Place, described how traffic has changed over the last <br />eighteen years. He urged Council to reduce Vineyard to two lanes. He noted he cannot open his <br />windows to get fresh air because of the noise. <br /> <br /> John Harcourt, 729 Montevino Drive, referred to the special features for traffic signals <br />mentioned by Mr. Knowles. He did not want to risk the safety of children with "trick lights" or <br />"training drivers to stop". He said red doesn't mean safe. It is unrealistic to think Highway 84 <br />will be widened any time in the near future. Cut-through traffic should be diverted from <br />Vineyard to Stanley and he felt that has suffered a major setback. He said traffic only backs up <br />at the stop signs on school days and for only about twenty minutes. He referred to a suggestion <br />he made in a letter to Council to take traffic off Vineyard and he was sorry to hear the bridge at <br />the arroyo has been delayed. <br /> <br /> Kari de Brun, 722 Montevino, said she has lived here for about a year and in that time the <br />traffic and noise has increased. She felt the problem was where Vineyard becomes two lanes in <br />each direction. People speed up to pass others and get to the stop sign first. She felt if there <br />were a traffic signal, drivers on Montevino would not slow down when they see a green light. <br />She agreed with narrowing Vineyard. <br /> <br /> Kevin Ryan, 3245 Chardonnay Place, supported narrowing Vineyard to one lane each <br />way. He related experiences when he has been running in the area and noted speeding ears. <br /> <br /> Sofia Garcia, 708 Montevino, opposed a traffic signal at Vineyard and Moutevino <br />because the lights will shine in her home and yard. She also felt it would affect access to her <br />driveway. People speed through the intersection and she said the vibration sets off the alarm on <br />her car. She has kept track of children crossing Montevino and she said in the last eight days <br />there were only two. Moving the bus stop has helped and she did not think that was an issue <br />anymore. Most traffic is after the children get the bus. She said the traffic backup is only twenty <br />minutes in the morning and twenty minutes in the afternoon. The rest of the day there is not a <br />traffic problem at Montevino and Vineyard. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 8 02/18/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.