My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN021803
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN021803
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
3/7/2003 3:49:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN021803
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom Gallagher, 612 Marsala Court, recommended only two lanes for Vineyard. He felt <br />slowing the traffic would eliminate the need for a signal at Montevino. A signal would cause <br />more of a backup. <br /> <br /> Jeff Nespor, 837 Clara Lane, said he is in the morning traffic on Vineyard every day and <br />he did not think it was that big a deal. He supported narrowing Vineyard to one lane in each <br />direction and to leave the stop sign as it is. <br /> <br /> Shelley Cartier, 4444 First Street, referred to a previous comment about Dale Way in the <br />Happy Valley area. She said that little road is a private road owned by three property ownem. A <br />renter on that road named Dale decided to put up a sign and call it Dale Way and that is how it <br />got its name. He urged Council not to refer to the lane by that name. Said she has experienced <br />traffic doubling on First Street. She acknowledged the efforts to solve the problems on Vineyard <br />and she sympathized with the residents in that area. However, she has heard more than once that <br />people want traffic offVineyard and back onto Stanley Boulevard. Stanley tums into First Street <br />and she did not think traffic belonged there either. Cut-through traffic does not belong in <br />Pleasanton at all. She felt planning should be done for the whole city and not one neighborhood <br />at a time. She wanted to meter a traffic signal at Ruby Hill and to meter a signal at Stanley and <br />Bemal/Valley to keep people fi.om coming into town. She had little hope that Highway 84 <br />would be improved within the next twenty years. <br /> <br />There were no fia'ther speakers on this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Knowles noted that there is more noise at a four-way stop than at a traffic signal. <br />With regard to improving access to the side streets and the mobile home park, he noted that a <br />traffic signal provides gaps in the flow of traffic which would make it easier to pull onto the <br />main street. He reiterated that the programmed visibility heads on traffic signals would <br />guarantee that the light would not shine in the yards or homes of nearby residents. The existing <br />stop signs at Montevino and Vineyard have severe problems because of drivers who are <br />speeding. Staffhas received a significant amount of complaints about crossing difficulties, <br />speeding, etc. at that intersection. There tends to be fewer problems with a traffic signal because <br />there are no rolling stops. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico asked if the special signals are installed that can only be seen by the cars, <br />does that create a safety problem for people crossing the street, since they cannot see the signal? <br /> <br /> Mr. Knowles said they would have pedestrian lights that would match the traffic signal. <br />There have been no pedestrian related safety problems with these types of signal heads. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala believed that the signal at Ruby Hill should be the first priority and asked how <br />soon it could be installed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Knowles said it is being funded and constructed by Signature Homes, not the City. <br />He was unsure what the timing was. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 9 02/18/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.