My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012103
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN012103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
2/13/2003 9:56:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/21/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN012103
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. McKeehan did not ~elieve that was a reasonable ~ssumption because the dista~c~ is <br />too great to walk or bicycle for elementary school children. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said it was far more likely to see children coming from the Vineyard Corridor <br />area and they would use the trail. He explained the various access points to the school. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pice clarified that the School District supported Alternative 1 and staff <br />recommended Alternative 1. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said staff wanted direction to move forward to complete construction plans <br />using the Alternative 1 concept plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala inquired about the tree removal in Alternative 1. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said there is a line of walnut trees along the existing road. Those are old trees <br />past their productive life and those will have to be removed for either of the alternatives. They <br />will be replaced in the landscape plan for the trail. The replacement is far easier in Alternative 1 <br />than Alternative 2. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayaia asked how many units Mr. Reznick would be allowed? <br /> <br />Mr. Swift said the Specific Plan allows six units in addition to the existing one. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the property owners along old Vineyard would be allowed to use it for <br />access. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said it is a function of the timing of the development that occurs. For instance, <br />if the realigned Vineyard and loop road are built as one project, which is the intention, and no <br />other development takes place for some period of time, then all of the existing driveways along <br />existing Vineyard will have to continue to use existing Vineyard. That plan will come before <br />Council for review. He explained how that may look. As development occurs, then the various <br />property owners' need to use the existing Vineyard disappears and he explained how that <br />worked. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked if staff had met with the property owners regarding this loop road. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said staff had met with those most affected by the loop road and have discussed <br />generally with every other owner about what might happen as it is conslxucted. All those <br />meetings have been positive. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 27 01/21/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.