My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041602
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN041602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:35 AM
Creation date
8/8/2002 8:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN041602
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. McKeehan indicated it was in Phase I. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico invited public comment <br /> <br /> Jack Dove, 5250 Case Avenue, S 110, read a letter from Pat Belding who wrote on behalf <br />of the Th-Valley Interfaith Poverty Forum. The group believed the Task Force has done a good <br />job of winnowing program ideas for the property to the twenty priorities previously submitted to <br />Council. It is the position of the group that if one of the program priorities is proposed to be put <br />individually on the ballot, then each of the twenty program priorities should be put individually <br />on the ballot. The community has not voted on the lighted sports park or a new school site, and <br />if there is to be one program priority singled out, it should be done for all. The residents have <br />given their input about their needs and it is time for Council to take action. Mr. Dove then <br />expressed his appreciation for all the work that Pat Belding does for the community. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico asked what action Ms. Belding wanted Council to take. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dove said ifa question is asked of the voters whether to allow af/brdable housing, <br />then all the other things identified as the twenty top priorities should also be presented for voter <br />approval. <br /> <br /> Maurine Behrend, 961 Maricaibo Place, San Ramon, indicated a year ago the Tri-Valley <br />Interfaith Poverty Forum members had just come from training regarding finding possibilities for <br />cities to address the housing shortage. Members of the Forum are working directly with people <br />in the Th-Valley, who are traveling long distances for jobs and have first hand experience with <br />the difficulties. When they addressed Council with these needs, they were told to work with the <br />Bernal Property Task Force. She said the members have done that and she was amazed to hear <br />that the citizens will vote separately regarding housing. She reiterated the comment from Ms. <br />Belding's letter, that a vote on the Bernal property should be a vote on the whole plan, not just <br />one element. San Ramon had a General Plan Review Commission, which recommended that <br />San Ramon provide its fair share of aftbrdable housing; a 25% inclusionary zoning ordinance, <br />etc. That plan passed with a 71% majority of the citizens of San Ramon. She believed that when <br />people have the right information, they will make the right decision. Her group is committed to <br />joining with others to educate the people of Pleasanton on the consequences of the housing crisis, <br />the human costs, the costs to business and the costs to the environment. She was hopeful there <br />would be a good election result, but she cautioned Council not to single out housing. It doesn't <br />look good. <br /> <br /> Jerry Thorne, 5144 Hummingbird Road, indicated he agreed with the park concept for the <br />property. He reminded Council that one of the reasons there were two Task Forces tbr the <br />Bernal property was to accelerate the lighted sports field and to get it constructed before the <br />residential units. He said from experience it has been shown that lighted sports fields are not <br />intrusive to residents. The dread is worse than the actuality. He urged Council to continue with <br />the lighted sports fields in Phase I and if something is placed on the ballot, that the sports fields <br />not be included. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 04/16/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.