Laserfiche WebLink
Mary Roberts, P. O. Box 154, Pleasanton, supported the citizens initiative, just as she had <br />supported Measure I. She believed the Bernal property is best used for public purposes. The <br />Bernal property is the result of a compromise to allow some development in exchange for the <br />public use of the remaining property. Council, the Commissions and Task Force have worked <br />very hard to incorporate 89 affordable units on the property. She felt the Council had done <br />something for affordable housing on this property. The rest of the acreage is best for public uses. <br />Housing is a private use. Public uses would be for the benefit of all the population, and would <br />include tot lots, community gardens, etc. Once housing of any kind is sited, the flexibility of the <br />plan is lost. She acknowledged the need for affordable housing, and also the need to relocate the <br />seniors from Pleasanton Gardens and Kottinger Place, when remodeling of those facilities <br />begins. She believed there are other options to be considered than the Bemal property, such as <br />the Busch property or Hacienda. She acknowledged there is a cost for the land there, but <br />Hacienda has fantastic public transit, which would be helpful for seniors. There are also three <br />planned unit developments proposed for assisted living and she described them. She believed <br />those units could be used for temporarily housing the relocated seniors. She noted that none of <br />these properties were suitable for a "central park". <br /> <br /> Christine Steiner, 596 Hamilton Way, indicated she strongly supported the concept of a <br />park for the Bernal property. She wanted the best for Pleasanton and for its seniors. She referred <br />to the City's assisted living project and indicated the terms of the financing program would not <br />allow relocation of the seniors to this facility unless they required assisted living. She did not <br />want to relocate seniors without a viable site. She said the request is for only five acres adjacent <br />to existing housing out of over 300 acres. She believed that is a very small request. She <br />believed it would be useful to have a workshop to dispel misinformation and myths about <br />affordable housing. It is frustrating to be on the Housing Commission, which has been charged <br />with finding ways to provide housing and to be told the Bernal property is not available, when <br />land is the critical issue. There are seniors who are living on $800 a month and cannot afford <br />their medications. People are renting rooms in homes, which increases traffic on streets. She <br />was not afraid to go to the voters so long as the voters have all the information about why <br />affordable housing is needed. Land cost is the critical component. She wants the best for <br />Pleasanton seniors, for families with children still living at home, or for those who want to bring <br />parents here so they can care for them. She urged everyone to attend the workshop to help them <br />understand the issues. If a ballot measure is put to the voters, she did not want it to target <br />housing and felt it would be discriminatory. <br /> <br /> Matt Sullivan, 7882 Flagstone Drive, indicated Council appointed the Bernal Task Force <br />to develop plans for the City-owned portion of the Bernal property. There are also strong <br />elements of the community with different view about this property; one that wants public uses in <br />a park like setting or additional affordable housing. Both goals are good ones, but may be <br />mutually exclusive. There is also a Specific Plan that calls for voter approval of the uses of the <br />property. He felt Council should first set the ground rules or basic policies for use of the <br />property. This should have been done before the Task Force went to all the work to develop its <br />detailed plan. The citizens initiative goes to the heart of this question. It is public land and the <br />only way to find out what the policies should be is to ask the public. As a Planning <br />Commissioner, he has been involved in the public review of both the San Francisco plan for <br />1900 houses and the Greenbriar plan for 581 houses and 300 acres of public land. He <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 04/16/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />