Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. McKeehan said that staff has been pursuing this, as has been for the past few <br />months. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the CMA item could be brought back for discussion. At <br />the Tri Valley Transportation Council meeting this month, they will be addressing some <br />of the same issues. Highway 84 has been a very high priority with TYTC and she would <br />not want to have a conflict take place. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said there is a lot of information to go through and some of this is <br />a matter of timing, what order they happen, and what the ultimate proposal would be. <br /> <br />Ms. Michelotti agreed. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said there has been no discussion at the CMA level at ail about this <br />subject. There have been some discussions at the Technical Advisory and Staff levels <br />only. The CMA is attempting to establish a place at which the Tri-Valley Task Force <br />will meet and this meeting will probably take place in July. There has been no action <br />taken by CMA and he would be glad to discuss this further with anyone. He felt it most <br />appropriate that Councilmembers get the new traffic report in order to look at this <br />complex issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis was at the Tri Valley Business Council and there is a lot of interest <br />about just what are the trade offs and they would like to know what they could do to help. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the Commission appointment timetable could be moved <br />forward, citing a situation whereby a member was resigning just as other appointments <br />were being made. The next scheduled application period is in the fall. Should the <br />Council go through the application process and appoint someone to this recently vacated <br />commission seat? <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said the City would be advertising in July for vacancies, looking at <br />interviews taking place in September, with appointment in early October, possibly <br />sooner. He did not feel there was any urgency in this matter and felt no need to change <br />the process by only one month for one position. It will stay as scheduled. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />Item 6a <br />Reconsideration <br />property. <br /> <br />of Council-sponsored initiative regarding the Bernal Avenue <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said the minutes from the April 16, 2002 City Council Meeting <br />were submitted because Council wanted to reconsider this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell said his reason for reconsideration was because he thought about <br />the initiative that he originaily sponsored and he realized that he was going against the <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 06/04/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />