Laserfiche WebLink
utilities should benefit everyone. They have been proud residems of Pleasanton for the <br />past ten years. They feel the school district, park and recreation services, and police and <br />fire departments make this a very special place to live. They would be proud to have the <br />opportunity to be a part of Pleasanton. In the last few years they have been optimistic <br />and they see an opportunity to express their support for this annexation. <br /> <br /> Tom Smith, 1070 Happy Valley Road, felt that the recent vote was a vote against <br />the annexation and not a vote against the golf course. A majority of the people voted <br />against the fear of traffic and that outweighed any benefit that the residents might have <br />gotten from the infrastructure. He fell, as an earlier speaker said, that the community <br />should start to accentuate the positive. There are so many positive things about this plan, <br />the trails and beautiful views and old oak trees, all of the preservation. Because of the <br />location and layout, this will probably be the best municipal golf course in Northern <br />California. There will be no problems filling it with golfers. Traffic will be challenging <br />and he wants to keep the bypass road in the plan and hold firm on this. The benefits far <br />outweigh the short term inconveniences. <br /> <br /> Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, addressed road safety issues. She <br />wanted to see the existing road hazards taken care of before the golf course is built. She <br />was concerned about the width of the road at the sharp turns. Alisal Street is used as a <br />race strip that needs to be addressed. Happy Valley Road has a very dangerous spot <br />where the temporary entrance to the course will be. The train trestle has a narrow <br />clearance. Because of these dangerous situations, she is asking Council to not move <br />forward with their plan until they can mitigate the existing conditions and insure that the <br />golf course traffic will be limited to the bypass road. <br /> <br /> Deirdre Gipson, 6187 Alisal, addressed the alternative bypass mad. The Happy <br />Valley Specific Plan has an upper bypass road in it and what is now being proposed is the <br />possibility of having this alternate bypass road on the lower area, through the Spotomo <br />flat area. She felt this is not a bypass road; it is essentially a new road. It brings all of the <br />traffic that would have been on the bypass, down Sycamore, down Alisal, into the loop <br />area. If the density is going to be increased to pay for some of this, this will mean <br />increased density and increased traffic. She lives on this road, her children play on this <br />road and she does not want traffic on this road. <br /> <br /> Vince Barletta, 6290 Laura Lane, said he was recently elected President of the <br />Alisal Improvement Club. In the last annexation vote, the residents really didn't vote <br />down a golf course, they voted down a fundamental change in their lives. An article from <br />a recent issue of the NCGA magazine titled "Economic Reality Thud on Golf Course <br />Construction" suggests that the shortage of golf courses is not really a shortage any <br />longer. One person stated this evening that we have no golf courses in Pleasanton. There <br />are three golf courses in Pleasanton, granted they are all private. The fiscal responsibility <br />of moving forward on this plan is important and yet the City does not have the money to <br />support its "Field of Dreams One" let alone its "Field of Dreams Two." If change is <br />coming to Happy Valley, most residents see the golf course and open spaces as a great <br />alternative. The last thing they would like is a Greenbriar/Bridle Creek development in <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 26 06/04/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />