CCMIN011502 - Laserfiche WebLink

and construct additional sidewalk on the east side of the corridor to within 150 feet of Stanley Boulevard. That trail would be in front of the building along Valley Avenue. It is anticipated that either the City or the Park District would construct the sidewalk from Boulder Street to Busch Road as part of the corridor. Mr. Campbell inquired about the material to be used in construction. Mr. Swift said most of the trail is asphalt, but will be concrete along the sidewalk in front of this project. Ms. Ayala referred to an agreement between the property owners and Alameda County for an extension of Boulder. She wanted to make certain residential and industrial traffic would be separated in that area. Mr. Swirl said additional property was acquired by the property owners to move the property line north to allow access from Boulder. A condition of approval requires the owners to grant to the City an open offer of dedication for the right of way necessary to extend Boulder to the Kiewit property. Ms. Dennis had concerns about the look of the outer tower even though she loved the look of the main building and its adjacent tower. Ms. Ayala indicated she has seen the same features on other storage facilities and she liked it. Mayor Pico asked if there was a master plan for this area including the Kiewit, Hansen and other surrounding properties? Mr. Swift said there was not a plan other than the General Plan of the City. Ms. Michelotti pointed out that consideration has been given for future access to the area by Boulder and this project will not interfere with future development of the area. Mayor Pico inquired about the signage for this project. He was concerned that a similar sign such as on the Self Storage facility would be used. Mr. Swirl said this application does not include approval of any signage. That will come later for review. He believed the applicant will want a wall sign rather than a monument sign. Ms. Ayala also expressed concerns about the signage on the comer. She referred to page 8 of the 11/28/01 Planning Commission staff report, which indicated Council determined not to do an East Side study. She felt Council did not want to do a study at that time, but she believed it was still on the priority list. Ms. Michelotti said that instead of an East Side land use study, staffhad been directed to do only a circulation study for the East Side. Pleasanton City Council 6 01 / 15/02 Minutes