My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN082101
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN082101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
9/6/2001 10:02:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN082101
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. McKeehan indicated that when property is annexed into a community there is a split <br />of the real property taxes generated by the property being annexed. Some of the funds which <br />were going to the County would then be transferred to the City. The City of Pleasanton has <br />maintained that it should receive taxes for the property being annexed at the same rate as <br />property in the rest of the community, so new property does not pay property taxes at a lower <br />rate than other property in the City. Sales taxes are not shared. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala believed most citizens think the City gets all the property tax, which is untrue. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan further explained that of every dollar in property tax collected, <br />historically the City had received 25 cents, the County received 37 cents and the rest went to a <br />variety of other public agencies. When the State became short of funds and started transferring <br />money for educational purposes (ERAF), it took some of the property taxes in order to balance <br />its own budget. The City's share of the property tax dollar was reduced to 18 cents and the <br />County's share went down more than that. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala indicated the economy improved in the late 1990's and the State then had a <br />surplus. What did the State do with the property taxes then? <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan indicated the State received pressure from cities and counties to return the <br />money that had been taken away. Out of approximately $3 million the City of Pleasanton had <br />lost, it has received only $160,000. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mayor Pico, seconded by Ms. Michelotti, to adopt Resolution No. <br />01-094, approving an application to the Local Agency Formation Commission to undertake <br />proceedings for the proposed Annexation No. 149 (Staples Ranch Phase II); and to adopt <br />Resolution No. 01-095, concerning the exchange of property tax revenue for Annexation <br />No. 149 (Staples Ranch Phase II). <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Campbell, Dennis, Michelotti, and Mayor Pico <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6e (4c) <br />Request from the Tri-Valley Business Council for Financial Support (SR 01:204) <br /> <br />Deborah McKeehan presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis indicated the Committee she serves on brings together a variety of <br />representatives from agriculture, trail advocates, environmental advocates, equestrians, etc. to <br />discuss the preservation of open space, whether it is for agriculture or publicly owned, to <br />enhance the quality of life of the urban as well as rural residents. She has attended the Tfi- <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 9 08/21/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.