My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN080701
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN080701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
9/6/2001 9:48:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/7/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN080701
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the company involved being the same company that developed the Golden Eagle <br />development and the history of that project. He suggested putting the item on a reserve <br />basis until more definitive examination of the property is conducted. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked Mr. Swift to confirm that the City had it's own consultant look <br />at the project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said that all of the work of the applicant's geologist was peer reviewed <br />by the City's geologist. <br /> <br /> Mr. Glenn said he still had major concerns about the City having a credible and <br />independent party looking at the project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotfi said the City does have an independent study made by a reputable <br />finn. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico said he feels comfortable with the high standards of the City. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said the City goes through an extensive process of selection of <br />peer review consultants. This consultant has an excellent reputation <br /> <br /> Larry Nebel, 8102 War Glory Place, Pleasanton, is concerned about the water <br />level computations and changing the grading and the direction of the water flow. He also <br />is concerned about the proposal of four lots and the placement of one of those lots <br />impacting his view corridor. <br /> <br /> Patrick Currin, speaking for the applicant, discussed the five year process <br />beginning with PUD-97-01 as a comprise measure stemming from litigation. The issue <br />was how to present the geological information compiled and reviewed, and showing that <br />it was appropriate and safe to build on the hillside portion of Oak Tree Farm. The answer <br />is what is being discussed in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. The <br />important thing tonight is to correct the errors that have happened in the past. He urged <br />Council to certify the SEIR and to certify it as originally drafted by staff without the <br />amendments of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Robert Ward, One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor, San Francisco, 94111, said the <br />ridgeline under study since the Berlogar Line was drawn has been one of the most <br />extensively studied pieces of land in the City of Pleasanton. Conncilmembers should <br />have the confidence that they know a great deal about this because of the geotechnical <br />review. He recommended the conditions that were sincerely added, but unnecessary at <br />the Commission level, be approved as originally drafted. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said staff recommendation is for certification of the revised SEIR <br />and for the one year of groundwater monitoring and the elimination of the Berlogar Line. <br />They have not included some of the conditions that are being referred to as a staff <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 08/07/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.