CCMIN071701 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. van Gelder said some of the people felt the calming device was effective. Does the City not do something because half the people feel it isn't effective and half the people feel it is? Part of the problem in neighborhood calming is the City does not have a great deal of tools to utilize. The City has police officers that are in short supply. They cannot be there on a continuous basis. The City does have the circles that take the high- end speed down at intersections but have little impact between. The only communities that he is aware of that are continuing to address strong neighborhood concerns is San Jose. They have supported by a vote of 9-0 photo radar use in neighborhoods. The neighborhood groups thought it was great. Ms. Ayala said it did not work for her. What Council is being asked to do tonight is to accept the reporl and talk about the sharing the expense. The questionnaire asked, "Are you willing to share in the cost?" Nobody wanted this. Why are we even going down this path? Certainly if we are going to have traffic circles, I want people to share. We know the answer is going to be "no" in the end, so why are we even going there.'? Mr. van Gelder said we don't know the answer is going to be "no" in the end because we know of other communities that have used them where there is a very strong positive response. He thinks if residents feel there is an excessive speeding problem in front of their house and this didn't solve it, then they are not for it. But if residents have a problem where the circle did solve it, they do support it. Seattle put in over 800 circles and each one went through an individual petition process. A partnership program for these circles go in effect and if residents want to take care of them, they want them pretty, they all volunteer to water them and put the flowers in them or they go in as ugly black buttons. The people, who supported it and did the landscaping, felt good about it because it solved their problems. Many of those locations had significant accident problems that were solved. Pleasanton has many perceived safety problems but not as many identified documented safety problems, so the City is working on what is it in individual neighborhoods that will make them feel it to be a more comfortable neighborhood in which to live. Ms. Ayala asked about the results of the questionnaire that said this is not the solution. Mr. van Gelder said for this neighborhood, obviously, if they had it to do over again, but it sounded like it would be 50-50 whether the City wants to spend this much money. Ms. Michelotti said at the beginning it kind of looked that way in each neighborhood. When the residents were surveyed originally they did not want this calming device. Mr. van Gelder agreed. He said a very large number of people said, "Don't waste your money, we don't have that kind of a problem, don't put anything in." But the City had a demonstration program where it felt the need to go forward and try to do something Pleas~ton City Council 24 07/17/01 Minu~es