CCMIN012301 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Ayala said it is not just her own opinion, but the comments of many people she has talked to in the community. We are elected to represent the entire community. When projects come forward, the main participants are those directly affected. She did not think the silo would be an eyesore on the hillside. The vote on the substitute motion was as follows: The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers- Ayala, Campbell, and Michelotti NOES: Councilmember Dennis and Mayor Pico ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ms. McKeehan clarified that Council wanted staff to continue with the rest of the project while staff is reviewing the silo issue. There was a break at 9:15 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:25 p.m. Item 6b Consideration of East Pleasanton Study and Scope of Work (SR01:020) Brian Swift presented the staff report. Mayor Pico declared the public hearing open. Adrienne Potter, 2601 Chocolate Street, inquired why Council decided not to include Stoneridge Drive or Staples Ranch in the study area. Mr. Swift said there was an approved Specific Plan for Staples Ranch and Stoneridge Drive. Council determined it was not necessary to study those areas over again. Mayor Pico said there was an attempt to include those areas, but the majority of the Council did not support that. Ms. Potter asked what the Council's motion was at this meeting? Mayor Pico said there was no motion as yet. He had asked for this agenda item to get further public comment on whether to have the study at all and whether to amend the boundaries and scope of the work. Ms. Potter asked if there would every be an opportunity for community input on Stoneridge Drive extension, the chain of lakes, or the power lines along E1 Charro? Pleasanton City Council 12 01/23/01 Minutes