My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN071800
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCMIN071800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:32 AM
Creation date
10/3/2000 8:55:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/18/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
masonry wail because this is an area that people see when going to the business park and <br />it should bc nice. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the park constmcfion would be phased and when <br />construction would begin. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wolfe indicated the Park and Recreation Commission recommended that this <br />project not be phased to avoid dual impacts on the neighborhood. The estimated cost is <br />$4.75 million and them is $2.8 million on hand. There are additional funds for an in-line <br />skating facility that can be reallocated to this project and the City anticipates receiving <br />$900,000 from Proposition 12 funds, so there is a shortPall of about one million dollars. <br />There are still negotiations in progress for a contribution from the Dublin San Ramon <br />Services District. It is hoped the funds will be found soon. IfCouncfi approves the <br />master plan at this meeting, it is anticipated a final design will be before Council and <br />construction could start by next spring. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta reminded Council there are also tindesignated funds in the Capital <br />Improvement Program budget. That will be before Council in July 2001, but there are <br />enough funds to start the project. <br /> <br />There were no further speakers so the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti indicated her point was that if the project were phased that <br />construction should start at the existing Val Vista Park area. She was in favor of the <br />additional restroom facilities, <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver indicated he had heard no objections to the second restroom <br />facility, only positive comnrents about the park. The only reservation was about the <br />fence. IIe wanted this to start as soon as possible. He liked the idea of an upgraded good <br />neighbor fence that is sturdy and will last. He tLrged Cmmcil to pursue partnership with <br />DSRSD on funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Pieo asked about the existing play equipment at Val Vista Park. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wolfe indicated the park maintenance staff has tried to remedy some oflhe <br />concerns raised, The manufacturer li3r this equipment is no longer in business and other <br />playground equipment manufacturers do not want to fabricate materials to improve this <br />equipment because of liability concerns. He did not believe the equipment was unsafe. <br />Hc pointed out that Ballistic United Soccer Club was also a financial partner in this <br />project. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Michclotti, to adopt Resolution <br />No. 00-096, approving the Negative Declaration with a f'mding of "de minimus <br />impact"; to find that the General Plan amendment is internally consistent with the <br />General Plan; to find that the rezoning is consistent with the goals and objectives of <br />the General Plan; to adopt Resolution No. 00-097 approving the General Plan <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 07/18/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.