CCMIN082100 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Costanzo indicated he would go back to San Francisco to discuss this. Crreanbfiar must pay fees for schools to San Francisco before it pays them to the Pleasanton Unified School District but he has committed to request San Francisco to reverse that process so the fees would be paid to Pleasanton first and San Francisco be paid later. He indicated Greenbriar had agreed to the fiat li~e agreement and offered construction management services should a fourth high school be constructed on the Bemal property by 2004. Mayor inquired about the dispute resolution clause and whether it was the intention to exclude members of the public. Mr. Roush explained this had to do with quesfions that may arise in the field where there may be differences of opinion in terms of application of the City standards, etc. Greenbriar felt there was no formal way to resolve issues expeditiously. It wanted a more formal process to know that if there were disputes that could not be resolved in the field, that it would be elevated high enough in the organization to get resdiufion quickly. If the issue was not resolve& it could go to the City Marrager then to the Council subcommittee. It was merely a way to expeditiously resolve issues in the field. That has been the informal practice in existence today. Ms. Dennis asked why only the property owner can appeal. Mr. Roush said the provision was not designed to prevent public discussion, it was more an internal process. Any City employee can come to the City Manager. He pointed out that section 5.5 deals with legal proceedings in the event there is a breach of the agreement. This is only a way to resolve internal disputes in a timely manner. Ms. Dennis asked about the concurrent processing of Alternative B. Mr. Costanzo said that is only so Greenbriar can be ready to proceed immediately at the end of the 24 months, if Aiternative A is not approved. Mr. Roush said that the final map for Alternative B would not be brought forward until the conclusion of the 24 months and it was determined that Alternative A would not be approved. Ms. Michelditi clarified that the Development Agreement has built in the ability to move ten to fiReen units if necessary and asked how that affects this? Mr. Roush indicated the decision would come back to Council. If conditions of the enviroxwnental agencies required that only certain lots could go on the eastern parcel, Council would have to review where to place the units that were taken off. Mayor Tarver stated discussious have referred to Greenbriar's processing the permits. Where does it say the City will be involved to make certain Alternative A is completed. Pleasanton City Council 15 08/21/00 Minutes