CCMIN080100 - Laserfiche WebLink

before the end of August to hold the second reading of those ordinances that are introduced on August 21st. Pat Costanzo, Jr., reprcsenting Greenbriar, presented an updated report since the previous meeting two weeks ago. At that time there was some direction given on what site plans to continue processing and with that direction, the design team put together the formal PUD application, which includes all landscape drawings, all site plans, all grading utility plans, all of the normal design drawings within a PUD. Those were submitted a week ago last Friday. Subsequent to that there was a Planning Commission meeting. The main topic at that meeting was green building principles and practices. The home builders and the commercial builders would be willing to incorporate this into their projects. Discussion took place concerning the site plans and the PUD drawings. Public input was also conducted at this meeting. Mr. Constanzo reviewed the three site plans with Councilmembers. Alternative A includes maximizing lhe number of housing on the eastern parcel, at the direction of Council. Ite said there is a commitment on the part of Greenbriar to attempt to get the approvals for this plan. Alternatives B and C were shown with alternate development patterns, should Greenbriar not be able to get the required permits to develop the eastern parcel at the 114 lots that are currently on the plan. Alternative A's commercial co~nponent includes eight buildings with 745,000 sq. ft. of space. The apartments are centered around the village commons area, off Valley Road. To the east of the apartments are the 4,000 sq. ft. lot alley-loaded product. Ninety-nine for sale lots are included in this with an additional 20 BMR units that are duets for sale. On the eastern parcel there are 101 - 5,000 sq. It. lots with 26 BMR duet units. On the west side there are 113 - 6,000 sq. ~. lots, 112 - 12.000 sq. it. lots and 10 BMR duet units. as well as the incorporation of a five acre neighborhood park. Dan Rosenbatm~, South Bay Development, is the commercial builder involved in the project. He showed the colored renderings of the different elevation types for review by Councilmembers, He said he has created a theme with variations and therefore the development will not look like eight identical buildings. There are certain techniques they have utilized using two difti:rent buildings with four different claddings. He said that with the design presented, a person could stand in different parts of the project, look at the buildings and from any angle the buildings will not look the same. Terry Lafrano, Architect with MBH Architects, showed the gouping of four buildings in the center with two groups of two buildings on the perimeter. The baildings arc designed for double entrance and linked together for the convenience of pedestrian traffic between the buildings. He discussed the scale, texture and materials involved in the commercial buildings and showed san~ples of these architectural elements. Ms. Ayala asked about the parking area and the number of trees in this part of the plan. pleasanton City Council I l 08/01/00 Minutes