My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081500
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCMIN081500
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:32 AM
Creation date
9/11/2000 9:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The meeting reconvened at 9:52 p.m. <br /> <br />item 6b <br />Rb98-03~ City of Pleasanton <br />A0plication to amend the Pleasanton Munlcinal Code to modify the I~rocess for <br />reviewine second units to allow the Zonine Administrator to aODrove or deny a <br />second unit after an administrative hearin~ and to create development standards for <br />second units in R-1 (Single-Family Rcsidcn~all and R-M {Multi-Family Residential) <br />zonin~ districts. (SR 00:192) <br /> <br />Bftan Swirl presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Ms. Dennis asked how many second units wcrc in the City at present. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swiec estimated about 100, but it was becoming more common to request <br />second units in the new subdivisions. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvcr asked if the new second units were controlled by PUD conditions <br />of approval. If that were so. why would the Planning Commission need to review <br />applications for second traits? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said most were part of a planned unit development. The Planning <br />Commission was concerned about the total amount of building on an existing <br />neighborhood lot. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico referred to the proposed provision that detached second units must be <br />single story and asked how that would apply to the Greenbriar proposal, which includes <br />second units over some detached garages. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained the second units would bc rcvicwcd as part of the PUD <br />process, which would be apart from the proposed ordinance. The Platruing Commission <br />felt detached two-story second units in existing neighborhoods would be a problem. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico was concerned about prohibiting something in existing neighborhoods <br />that would be allowed in new developments. He asked if units above retail space <br />downtown was considered a second unit. <br /> <br />Mr. Swirl said no. <br /> <br />Mayor Tarver declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br />There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 08/15/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.