CCMIN030700 - Laserfiche WebLink

can make him happy. The house meets all the Municipal Code requirements for setbacks, height, separation, and floor area. Ms. Michelotti said this is not an easy situation. There is conflict between neighbors and a brand new neighbor is wondering what is going on. She did not feel there was a problem with the difference between fourteen and fifteen feet for the bungalow roof. She has looked at this and did not feel it was fair to have Mr. Chestnut tear off the roof and lower it. A substitute motion was made by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Ayala, to uphold the decision of the Zoning Administrator regarding the height of the bungalow with a composition roof. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Michelotti and Pico NOES: Councilmember Dennis and Mayor Tarver ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ms. Michelotti believed if the use of the barn and second unit had been discussed in the beginning, some of the conflict and mistrust could have been avoided. She agreed some notice should have been given for the change to the shingle roof of the barn, but she did not support tearing it off now. She asked if approval were given to move forward with the plans for the house if these were the ftnal plans as submitted. Mr. Swift said yes. Ms. Ayala said there were no neighbors who opposed it. except for Mr. Ciesielski, who does not want a two story house. Ms. Michelotti wanted to add a condition concerning the cleanup on the Ciesielski property. Ms. Ayala said that was for the bam and Council is dealing with the house now. Ms. Michelotti felt there would still be issues if the barn is not built as planned. She referred to Ms. Dennis' comments about dealing with one thing at a time. Ms. Dennis referred to this project being reviewed as an addition to the house rather than a new dwelling and asked if that required difl~rent noticing roles. Mr. Swift said with regard to what is happening with the existing house, the procedures are identical in terms of process. It is administrative design review. What is not subject to design review under any City Code is what is proposed for the barn. It is an existing structure that is being repaired and rehabilitated. It is a non-conforming structure that could not be built under today's regulations because it is too tall. Mr. Chestnut has taken pains to try to rehabilitate it in a way the neighborhood and staff have indicated it Pleasanton City Council 16 03/07/00 Minutes