Laserfiche WebLink
Pat Murray, 4470 Mirador Drive, thanked Council and staff for enacting the <br />discount for low income residents for the water and sewer charges. It was a creative way <br />to offset the costs of the bond measure, if it is adopted. <br /> <br /> Betty Dimmick, 4007 Peregrine Way, expressed her concern about the <br />cancellation of Next Steps and the Heritage Program. This was done without advance <br />notice to the City or families of participants. Adult daycare is extremely important for <br />seniors and their caregivers. She described the many benefits of the programs and <br />activities and urged Council to continue this service. <br /> <br /> Scott Wade, 5808 San Juan Way, expressed his concern regarding the all night <br />lighting near the Greenbriar sales office and asked Council to address the situation. <br /> <br /> Paulette Salisbury, 6170 Corte Trancas, announced a meeting of the Regional <br />Water Quality Control Board in Oakland on February 16. She asked Council to authorize <br />a City representative from staff to attend and reiterate the City' s objection to the injection <br />of reverse osmosis treated water into the groundwater basin. She asked that the <br />representative invite the Regional Water Quality Control Board to hold another hearing in <br />Pleasanton. She said there were many in attendance at the last meeting at Pleasanton <br />Middle School and she thanked those who spoke. She asked the citizens to attend the <br />meeting in Oakland and urged residents to vote no on Measure J. <br /> <br /> Mike Moran, 2321 Sandpiper Way, presented a visual demonstration of how the <br />School District Board and staff is organized and how he believed it operates. He believed <br />it was a delicate balance of all its pans and should not be meddled with from outside. He <br />was also concerned about the School Board members who try to directly give orders to <br />School District staff. <br /> <br /> Peter MacDonald, 5258 Crestline Way, Co-Chair of the Yes on J Committee, <br />indicated Pleasanton residents are currently drinking treated wastewater from <br />Sacramento, Stockton, Tracy, and agricultural runoff which goes into the delta and comes <br />back out the taps in Pleasanton within five days. The reverse osmosis treated water <br />would be purified to distilled water quality, pumped into the underground aquifer and <br />would not get to the tap for five years. He said there is no comparison in the quality of <br />the two waters. Delta water has nine times the impurities as reverse osmosis treated <br />water. Anti-recycling is an environmentally damaging policy and has a negative impact <br />on our children's futures. He believed new water sources would have to come from <br />damming pristine mountain canyons, outbidding the Central Valley farmers, or <br />withdrawing water from stream flows and depriving riparian species of water. He felt the <br />opponents of recycling water were mostly the same people who sponsored the CAPP <br />Initiative and they would not stop until there is no water, no roads and no homes for the <br />children of the future. Reverse osmosis treated water is far better than what Zone 7 is <br />giving the citizens today. Recycling and resource conservation is the only way <br />Californians can maintain the natural environment and preserve the standard of living. <br />He urged citizens to vote yes on Measure J <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 4 02/15/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />