Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Ayala clarified that Ms. Testa was requesting the City to write a letter to the <br />School District to have a workshop on the audit material. Ms. Ayala indicated she was <br />on the School Impact Fee Committee and it was her understanding that the developer fees <br />could cover a portion of the cost of the audit. The Impact Fee Committee has agreed to <br />meet right after the election and suggested that date be set. Ms. Ayala also requested the <br />Mayor to write to the School Board president to request a joint meeting to be scheduled. <br /> <br /> Ms. Testa agreed with that. She said their mission in this whole process was to <br />identify money that could first be taken from developer fees before any of the bond <br />money is used, <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver agreed with that approach and felt there was no way to address this <br />issue before the November election. <br /> <br />Ms. Dennis asked if the City staff would be reviewing the audit. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta indicated staff would work with the committee. There would not be <br />an independent review. Staff would try to answer questions. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said some information was to be provided by the auditor about <br />State funding. It was difficult to determine what was allocated by the State for each of <br />the bond measures and for developer fees. <br /> <br /> Dorene Paradiso, 3168 Paseo Granada, offered congratulations to the Police and <br />Fire Departments. She stated that the No on Measure D committee is a grass roots <br />committee and it has collected only $8,000, not $500.000 as stated by Mr. Kumaran, and <br />it is not accepting developer money. At the last Council meeting. she was shocked to <br />hear CAPP authors supporting approval of some of the Vineyard Corridor property <br />owners, but they remain silent for the previous Corridor landowners that came before the <br />Council. She felt this was a selective stamp of approval. Now that the authors of <br />Measure D have admitted that the Vineyard Corridor was not supposed to be included in <br />the Initiative, it is clear that the CAPP Initiative was not well thought out before bringing <br />it to the voters. The Mayor has stated that the CAPP Initiative is bad government, but no <br />other alternative has been put forward that he could support. Ms. Paradiso agreed <br />Measure D is bad government and asked the voters to reject it. She asked the Council to <br />develop a fair and reasonable alternative initiative for the March ballot. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />7 10/05/99 <br /> <br /> <br />