Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Dennis asked him how he felt about the loss of use of radar in this area. <br /> <br /> Mr. Startsbury was not concerned because of the enforcement in the portion of <br />Hopyard that is 25 mph. He wanted to keep the speed limit the same until Hopyard is <br />widened in the future. <br /> <br /> Ryan Gette, 5517 Black Avenue, indicated he lives on Black Avenue near <br />Hopyard and has many reasons for not wanting to raise the speed limit. but has found no <br />good reason to raise it. There are no major commercial or retail developments in this <br />area, so there is no reason to bring traffic to this area. This section is primarily a <br />residential area. Raising the speed limit would have detrimental effects. It will raise the <br />noise level, raise the potential for serious accidents and increase the danger to children <br />attending the elementary school a few blocks down on Black Avenue. There is also a <br />daycare center on the corner of Hopyard and Del Valle. He felt raising the speed limit <br />between Valley and Del Valle would disrupt this natural progression and confuse <br />motorists and would encourage motorist to exceed the 25 mph limit past Del Valle since <br />it is abruptly decreased from 40 mph. This is a residential area that is already endangered <br />by a large volume of traffic already exceeding the speed limit, It makes no sense and <br />benefits no one to raise the speed limit on this section of Hopyard. <br /> <br /> Greg Evans, 5610 Paseo Navarro, agreed with the remarks of other speakers and <br />asked Council to reject increasing the speed limit, He related difficulty in leaving the <br />parking lot at Gene's Market and entering Hopyard from Hansen Road. He believed <br />increasing the speed limit will increase the danger at the BlackYHopyard intersection for <br />children going to Walnut Grove Elementary. He expressed his problems in getting onto <br />Hopyard Road at Black Avenue and complained of the house on the comer where the <br />yard is elevated and blocks his view of oncoming traffic. He did not think it was <br />necessary to raise the speed limit on Hopyard Road. <br /> <br /> Kate Barker, 2050 Harvest Road, indicated the east side of Hopyard has no <br />sidewalk. People who want to walk downtown have to cross Hopyard to get to the <br />sidewalk because the west side is the only sidewalk that goes all the way downtown. She <br />and her neighbors are lucky to live close enough that they can walk or rollerblade to <br />activities or events downtown. She is also concerned about the school children in the <br />area who frequently visit their friends in the neighborhood. She would prefer the speed <br />limit to be 25 mph from Black to Del Valle until the improvements are made to Hopyard. <br />It is confusing the way the road goes from two lanes to one. Ten years ago there were <br />many accidents on Hopyard and she is concerned that it will happen again. She <br />complimented the traffic department on the timing of the traffic signals because traffic <br />flows well. Pleasanton residents are spoiled compared to other cities such as Palo Alto, <br />Berkeley, Fremont. San Leandro. etc. She commends the traffic department and its <br />studies, but this is a neighborhood and 40 mph is too fast. She cannot think of any other <br />neighborhood with that speed limit. She cited the residential area on Santa Rita from <br />Valley to Mohr Avenue, which is 35 mph. <br /> <br />Ms. Dennis asked how this item was noticed. <br /> <br />10 10/05/99 <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />