Laserfiche WebLink
Mike St. John, 383 Christina Court, president of the Pleasanton Firefighters Association, <br />indicated his belief that negotiations are at impasse and presented the issues still in contention, <br />which he believes are paramedic service, emergency response times, staffing levels, and <br />hazardous materials management. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta believed that the service of the firefighters in responding to emergency calls <br />has been excellent. She stated that the City must make business decisions like any other <br />corporation. The issues involved in the negotiations are no different than issues faced by any <br />other employer: it is money, not safety. The employee group is cloaking the issues in safety; <br />however, the bottom line is how to make sure the community safety needs are met in a cost <br />effective manner. In government it is often harder to resolve issues because of the <br />sensationalism created by the media. The City has an adopted process for resolving contractual <br />differences. The next step is to meet with the City Manager to determine if there is a chance <br />to resolve the issues prior to mediation. The first meeting with the City Manager is scheduled <br />for November 15, 1994. This is the first time that Ms. Acosta will be meeting with the group <br />as she has not been directly involved in the negotiation process to this point. The next step after <br />that is mediation. Because the firefighters have chosen to make the issues public, Ms. Acosta <br />felt obligated to respond. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said that there are currently five people at each fire station and the City <br />proposes to assign four people, which is still a higher standard than most other cities in Alameda <br />County and in California. Because of this change, it will not be necessary to hire as many <br />people in the future as new fire stations are completed. This will also allow returning the <br />medical response function to the engine company and proceeding with the non-transport <br />paramedic program. There are only two exceptions to the four-person standard. One involves <br />the new fire station for the easterly side of the City. This station would work with the Railroad <br />Avenue station until the Railroad Avenue station is relocated to a new station that might be <br />constructed on the San Francisco property. Currently the entire south and southeast portion of <br />the city are provided fire and medical response by five persons from the Railroad Avenue station <br />and under the proposed plan, that area would be served by seven persons. The other exception <br />is the cinergency response for Ruby Hill. This area will include ,5re sDrinklers in structures. <br />which enables a longer ~esponse time for tile Fire Department. There is a cooperative agreement <br />with the Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton to share coverage of this area. This agreement will <br />save the City several hundred thousand dollars annually. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta believed the proposed staffing levels would address the safety needs of the <br />community. The staffing levels required on a particular day dramatically affects overtime. The <br />City is reluctant to agree to guaranteed staffing that requires more personnel than deemed <br />necessary because it results in increased overtirnr-costs. Currently the City is paying over <br />$600,000 annually for overtime, which is three times what other agencies the City's size pay. <br />The way in which absences are filled is driving this cost and is an issue in the negotiations. <br /> <br />11/01/94 <br /> - 5 - <br /> <br /> <br />