My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110194
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCMIN110194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:30 AM
Creation date
2/1/2000 8:01:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to approve the modification to the <br />recycling program for the city to provide recycling bags; to authorize expenditure of up to <br />$110,000 in Measure D distributions during fiscal year 1994-95 to purchase and distribute the <br />bags; and to publicize the recycling program. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Mohr, Pico, Scribner, and Mayor Tarvet <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 8b <br />Circulation Draft Tri-Vallev Transportation Plan/Action Plan (SR 94:368) <br /> <br />Randall Lure presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Ms. Dennis asked for an explanation of the HOV lanes. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder indicated that the majority of metropolitan regions think of public <br />transportation in terms of light rail. However, many cities have all bus systems. Many people <br />can be moved in HOV faster than in single occupancy vehicles. That entices more people into <br />public transportation and gets them to a point where rail transport is more cost effective. If a <br />new HOV lane can be added and reserved for high occupancy vehicles, it would help in getting <br />seamless routes connecting from San Joaquin into the Bay Area. <br /> <br />Ms. Mohr asked if the gateway concept were being used anywhere else in the state. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder stated that in practice it was being done; for instance, all of the bridges. <br />The Tri-Valley plan says there are physical constraints in place and no funding sources expected <br />to change that, so recognize that in the planning and until a way is found to remove the gateway, <br />it should be considered in trying to accommodate the traffic. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mohr indicated the Altamont situation is similar to the Dublin grade situation in <br />1980. Many people did not want it widened because it would open the development potential <br />for this Valley. The political pressure reached the point that approval was given to widen the <br />road. It is possible that the political pressure will also cause the Altamont to be widened, so we <br />cannot rely on the Altamont to be the bottleneck to control traffic into the Valley. We cannot <br />build our network based on the gateway control of the Altamont. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder agreed the political pressures will determine what projects will be done. <br />Staff has to look at Caltrans' plans for the corridor. Caltrans has considered ten lanes eventually <br />and the Tri-Valley plan proposes to preserve that last lane for moving the most people possible <br />in the most efficient way. <br /> <br />11/01/94 <br /> - 14 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.