Laserfiche WebLink
Council to consider another one or two points for Environmental Considerations as <br />this project would be especially aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood since <br />the area is now an eyesore. <br /> <br />-15 Vintage Associates Tract 3161 (Fairlands @ Pimlico) <br />-16 Vintage Associates Vintage Hills Commons <br /> Mr. Doyle Heaton, representing Vintage Association, stated that since Tract 3161 <br /> received a low score they will come back next year on this project. With regard to <br /> Vintage Hills Commons, Mr. Heaton stated his firm would like to continue with the <br /> approved plan for 70 townhouses. He stated many improvements had been accomplished <br /> in this area such as the widening of Tawny Road, which he felt should receive one or <br /> two points. He stated the drainage problems had been solved also. He added that <br /> this project would be moderate or affordable housing of which there are very few <br /> under construction now and which are greatly needed in Pleasanton. He strongly <br /> urged the 15% extra allocation allowable under RAP be considered this year. <br /> <br />-17 Northwood Homes, Inc., Tract 3458 (Oak Hill) <br /> Mr. Ron Harrison, representing Northwood Homes, Inc., stated this project could <br />not get more points because major points were given at the initial development for <br />capital improvements. He asked Council to consider the possibility of getting 8- <br />units approved in two four-unit parcels outside of RAP. <br /> <br />-19 Chamberlain Group PUD-78-5 (Arbor Drive) <br /> Mr. Ed Pozas, representing the Chamberlain Group, requested Council to note the <br />difference in this and last year's application concerning the In-kind category. <br />This year's application includes improvements to Arbor Drive and Vintage Hills park <br />site, for a total of 9 points for In-kind. Mr. Pozas elaborated on the benefits of <br />construction of a pump station in the Vintage Hills area. He asked Council to <br />consider granting 3 points as they did last year by re-evaluating last year's deci- <br />sion on the '~issing Links". <br /> <br /> Mr. Roger Manning, 1078 Vintner Way, President of Vintage Hills Homeo~mers Asso- <br />ciation, emphasized the need for the Vintage Hills park and additional water flow, <br />and requested Council to consider additional points in the In-kind category for <br />this project. <br /> <br />Multiple Projects <br /> <br />-08 Stoneson/Stoneridge Condominiums <br /> Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer representing Stoneson, stated that no points <br />were given to this project because of its proximity to a shopping center, and there <br />is a technical problem with the request for a phased project. <br /> <br />-10 Harris/Forest Condominiums (Santa Rita Road) <br /> Mr. Mike Harris, applicant, stated he did not disagree with staff on their re- <br />commendations of points for this project, but he requested that Council give con- <br />sideration to an additional 5 points for Design because of the landscape and design <br />of this project for moderate income housing. <br /> <br />-11 ~dden/PUD-80-5 (Vineyard Avenue) <br /> Mr. Joseph Madden, applicant, stressed the fact that 25% of his project would <br />be lower or moderate income housing and decried the fact that the Residential <br />Allocation Program contained no criteria for "affordable" housing. He stated that <br />in order to get affordable housing the Council should opt for approving all of the <br />multiples applied for this year. Mr. Madden further felt that his project should <br />have more points for both architectural and site layout under the Design category <br />and also felt he deserved more points for Environmental Considerations, especially <br /> <br />3. 11/18/80 <br /> <br /> <br />