CCMIN111880 - Laserfiche WebLink

-01 Castlewood Properties PUD-79-9 (Pico Avenue) Mr. Art Dunkley, owner of the property, stated he was granted 26 sewer connec- tions last year. He asked that Council consider the following three points: (1) The partial approval that he received on January 22, 1980, left the project unbuild- able and he needed the remaining 8 sewer connections to make the development economi- cally viable; (2) He requested that Deisgn be given an additional 5 points (for a total of 13 points), based on the fact that these will be custom building sites which are needed in the City of Pleasanton; and (3) He requested that Dedications and Improvements be granted an additional 6 points (for a total of 15 points) be- cause of the improvements that will be required on Pico Avenue and Vineyard Avenue. -02 Crocker Homes Parkside (40 unit pro~ect) -02 Crocker Homes Parkside (6 unit project) Mr. Harvey Kameny, representing Croeker Homes, stated this development is a continuation of the project. Me requested one additional point be given to each of the categories of Design, Air Quality, and Other Environmental Features, making a total increase of 3 points. He stated he felt consideration should be given because the project is within 1/2 mile of a grocery store. He requested a minimum of 53 points for the 40-unit project, and a minimum of 59 points for the 6-unit project. Mr. Peter Turner, Attorney representing Mr. McManus, stated that Council should consider that if they approved all units next year there would still not be suffi- cient housing in Pleasanton to meet the demand. He stated that Crocker Homes is a strong company and would like to go ahead with 40 more units in 1981. He urged Council to consider the increase of 3 points for this project. -03 Morrison Tract 3344 (Heritage Valley) Mr. Tom Moran, representing Morrison Homes, requested Council to consider in- creasing point allocation in the following categories: (1) Increase Design by 1 point because of modifications made to the roof and floor plan; (2) Increase Bicycle Feature by 1 point because of the bike system in the Heritage Valley community development; and (3) Increase Design another 1 point because of park dedication and improvements. He added that approval of all of the 40-units would eliminate the inconvenience to existing neighbors and permit a more efficient development. -04 Chang Su-O Lin Tract 4473 (Amberwood; 86-unit project) -05 Chang Su-O Lin Tract 4473 (9-unit project) Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer representing Chang Su-O Lin, stated he agreed with staff's recommendation for points. He requested that Council approve the 80- units in a phased project and/or the 9-unit project, but did not want anything in- between. -06 Calmore Associates PUD-80-7 (Fairlsnds Drive) Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer representing Calmore Associates, stated he felt staff recormnendations were fair on this project. -07 Stoneson Tract 3150 (Stoneridge) Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer representing Stoneson, stated this is the last portion of a townhouse project that was started ten years ago and he felt it should be completed. -09 Mackay Tract 4385 (Hansen @ Valley) Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer representing Mackay, stated this project was originally a neighborhood shopping center and now it is an R-1 project with 25 lots. He stated that water lines would be improved as well as the development of Valley Avenue, which he felt should receive consideration as missing links. He also urged 2. 11/18/80