Laserfiche WebLink
OJ <br /> <br />since his orchard is not in use and he will be doing very little grading. <br /> <br />-18 Price Development Corporation/Black Avenue Condominiums <br /> A representative of Price Development Corporation stated this developer was <br />satisfied with the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Mercer recessed the meeting at 9:40 P.M. <br /> <br />Mayor Mercer reconvened the meeting at 9:45 P.M. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that Council would now consider the questions listed in <br />the staff report as follows: <br /> <br />May a Developer E~ther with Existing Phased Approval or Receiving Phased Approval <br />also Receive Approval for a Separate Project? <br /> Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer, urged a Yes vote on this question. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- <br />member Kephart, that a developer with either existing phased approval or receiving <br />phased approval may also receive approval for a separate project. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />How Shall Mr. Oakes' "School Site" Property be Characterized for Purposes of the <br />DSRSD Priority List? <br /> Mr. Levine stated that after hearing Mr. Oakes testimony earlier, he feels Mr. <br />Oakes is only trading capacity between projects listed on the B-2 list, which would <br />eliminate the problem listed in the question above. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that <br />Council tentatively affirm Mr. Oakes' right to trade capacity between his projects <br />listed on the B-2 list. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />May Crocker Homes Apply for 10 Units and Use the Same Score as the 3-Year Phased <br />Project Received Last Year? <br /> Mr. Peter Turner, Attorney representing Mr. McManus, stated he felt this is <br />logical and allows good planning. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moyed by Mayor Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember <br />Wood, that Crocker Homes be allowed to apply for 10-units and use the same score <br />as the 3-year phased project received last year. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Ted Fairfield asked what procedure will be followed at the meeting on <br />Monday night. He requested that the 15% extra allocation be considered in Council's <br />decision. After discussion, Mayor Mercer advised that additional testimony would <br />be received from developers on the staff report that will be prepared on Thursday, <br />and that the 15% extra allocation consideration will not be discussed until after <br />points are given. <br /> 4. 11/18/80 <br /> <br /> <br />