CCMIN111880 - Laserfiche WebLink

35:i MINUTES of THE MEETING of THE CITY COUNCIL November 18, 1980 CALL TO ORDER - PLEDGE TO THE FLAG Mayor Kenneth Mercer called the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 8:00 P.M., and then led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL Deputy City Clerk Doris George called the roll which is recorded as follows: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, }bhr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer were present. Mr. Walker, City Manager, Mr. Levine, City Attorney, Mr. Warnick, Director of Public Works and Utilities, Mr. Harris, Director of Planning and Community Development, and Mr. Swift, Assistant to the City Attorney, were present. RAP - SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR 1981 Mayor Mercer stated the purpose of this meeting is to review the projects for 1981 to be considered under the Residential Allocation Program and to take testi- mon~ from developers regarding the staff report and recommended rankings. Mayor Mercer stated each project would be considered as listed on the staff report with the exception of Mr. George Oakes, who has to leave early to attend another meeting. Mayor Mercer advised that no decision would be made by Council tonight but a deci- sion is expected to be made at the City Council meeting scheduled for November 24, 1980. Single-Family Projects -12 Amador Valley Investors PUD-79-14 (Fairlands @ Brockton) -13 Amador Valley Investors PUD-80-3 (W. Las Positas) -14 Amador Valley Investors Tract 3148 (Fairlands @ Gulfstream) Mr. George Oakes, representing Amador Valley Investors, presented background information on the subject projects. Mr. Oakes reviewed the history of the school site property as well as reviewed the current PUD proposal for that site. Mr. Oakes suggested that because of the history of the site that charity suggests a special category in RAP for its approval. He further stated that access to the park has been provided in all the Fairlands cul-de-sacs and it was a mere oversight that it was not included in this project; the project would have park access. Concerning environmental features, Mr. Oakes reviewed the optional solar water heating, extra large lots, and the difficulty of developing the site due to the need for earth fill and the closeness of adjoining neighbors. He asserted that it made sense to develop the school site with the rest ~f Tract 3148, especially with the fill required. With respect to Project 80-13, Mr. Oakes again asserted that relative to these three projects first things must be done first and although this project scores higher than Tract 3148 area projects, it logically should be developed after Tract 3148. He agreed with the staff recommended point allocation for Project 80-13. With regard to whether the school site property should be characterized as a B-2 or B-3 list property, Mr. Oakes explained that the school site would be using sewer capacity transferred to it from other B-2 list projects and that therefore it should be characterized as a B-2 project.