Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Swift stated when Council approved that PUD there were no house designs to <br />review, so it approved design guidelines. The lots in that subdivision range from 10,980 <br />to over 11,000 square feet in size. The allowed FAR is 40%. The houses that have been <br />submitted to staff for final approval range in size from 3,008 to 3,911 square feet. That <br />compares to the proposal for the Nolan property. The smallest house is 2,500 square feet <br />with the largest being 4,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Ms. Michelotti asked if the 40% FAR was necessary for the affordable units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift did not think anything more than 40% was necessary, however, the <br />issue will be resolved once the design of the units is reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission. It is anticipated those will be single story units in the 1300-1400 square <br />foot size and the FAR will not be an issue. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if the Council has ever approved a project without a plan in <br />front of it. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift said it has occurred many times. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked what the selling price for the five moderate-income units <br />would be. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said the details of the plan will be reviewed by the Housing <br />Commission. To be affordable to moderate income families, the homes would have sell <br />to a household in the 80% to 120% of the median income. The discussions so far with <br />SummerHill have focussed on 100% of median income. What that translates into as to <br />selling price depends on the interest rate at the time of sale. At today' s rate it would be <br />about $210,000; the median income of Pleasanton is quite high. If this project had <br />proposed affordable housing in its original application, it would have gone to the Housing <br />Commission for review first. However, the staff recommended the addition of affordable <br />units, so it has not been reviewed by the Housing Commission. The Commission will <br />have the opportunity to help develop the marketing program for the units. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti clarified that a density bonus had been given in order to create an <br />affordable product. She asked if affordable housing fees are still paid on the 31 market <br />rate units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said all market rate units will pay the fee. The moderate income units <br />will not pay the lower income housing fee. The city would take the fee from the market <br />rate units and give that back to the developer to subsidize the production of inclusionary <br />moderate income housing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if it was unusual that the plan was not sent back to the developer, <br />and reviewed again by the Planning Commission before being heard by Council. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 13 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />10/26/99 <br /> <br /> <br />