CCMIN110999 - Laserfiche WebLink

all the infrastructure is advanced by the School District, it would be reimbursed as other properties develop. Mayor Tarver said that if the school is built, it would have to have a road, sewer and water lines to the school. The question is how to get the road from the school to the other end of Vineyard Avenue. That is the funding gap that would occur if the School District builds right away and there is no other development. He pointed out it is possible to have a jurisdictional dispute. The City says if the school is built, it has to have a new road to it. The School District has the authority to build the school without the road improvements. Mr. Brozosky referred to the land for the road. There are three property owners that have to provide an easement or donate the property. What happens if the school is constructed and the property owners are not ready to give up their land for the road? He expressed concern about the phasing program and the possibility that each developer would just build its portion of infrastructure as it is ready to develop. He did not want to see the road ripped up every month or year. He wanted to see the construction done all at once. Mr. Swift said the only place that is likely to occur is in the westem area and he explained various scenarios. However, since that portion is probably to be constructed by one developer, it is not expected to be a problem. Ms. Michelotti said the first decision to be made is by the School District on whether it will proceed with construction of the school. Mr. Brozosky was concerned about locations of fire hydrants. He referred to the financing program 3, pan B, which allowed the school to be constructed with an on-site septic system. He did not want that because of concerns the School District would not connect to the sewer system. He was also concerned about the effect of the septic system on the Vineyard area wells. He also wanted to be certain that if a land use changed that demanded more infrastructure, that it would pay a fair share for the infrastructure. He felt Program 4 negates that requirement. Program 15 was discussed earlier. It requires $4,000 added each year with 8% interest. He felt 8% was high. He has no plans to develop for ten or fifteen years. When you calculate $4,000 a year and 8%, by the time he wanted to develop, he couldn't because the fees would be more than his property will be worth. He felt this plan encourages development as soon as possible. He believed there might be a time period when there is no development, or if there were a referendum that prohibited development, he did not believe the property owners should be penalized. He referred to a section of the Specific Plan that indicated if a property owner does not file a final subdivision map within fifteen years from the date of the adoption of a plan by the Council, the propert).' owner is not obligated to pay the Specific Plan preparation fee. He did not feel they should pay the administration fee for the plan as well. Table 1, Part 2, does not include provision of storm water drainage. Table 1, Part 5, refers to utility undergrounding and he asked when that was to take place. Was it in conjunction with development on Lot 18 and does that property owner pay for it? If that is so, he did not Pleasanton City Council 12 11/09/99 Minutes