CCMIN110999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Roush believed the developer fees would cover the cost of the land, improvements and perhaps improvements directly in front of the school. He was uncertain that those fees could be used for the remaining infrastructure. Ms. Ayala pointed out that the developer who signed the Cooperative Agreement also developed Ruby Hill. Ruby Hill residents are the ones who need the road and the school, so isn't it reasonable to ask the developer to advance the necessary funds? Mr. Roush said the developer may be willing to talk about it. Ms. Michelotti clarified that there was a recommendation that the water, sewer, and road would be installed at the same time the school is constructed. Subsequently, Council was advised it could not require this to occur because the School District can do whatever it wants to. She felt the community objective is to have all the infrastructure in place for the school. With an extra 40 units or a fee of $1.2 million, then there would be enough money to build the roadway. She believed that was the figure that remains unfunded. However, she believed the water and sewer was necessary in addition to the road. Mr. Pico asked about the status of the neighborhood traffic calming program. Mr. Lum said staff has had two meetings with the neighborhood and will have one more before bringing the plan to the Council. A review process is in motion and as soon as there is an available agenda, it will come to Council. Ms. Michelotti asked if there were traffic calming plans for the Vineyard Corridor. Mr. Swift said when the Specific Plan was adopted the issue was raised whether the Specific Plan area would pay for traffic calming in the area west of the Specific Plan area. Council determined the costs would not be paid for by the existing neighborhood, but would be paid for by the City. Mayor Tarver declared the public hearing open. Steve Brozosky, 1700 Vineyard Avenue, believed this was more a phasing plan than a financing plan. He thought it was put together quickly because of the CAPP Initiative and still needed to address other issues. He would like to have a workshop where the property owners could talk to staff and get a better understanding of the impacts. He was concerned about the phasing plan. He did not believe the School District could be required to advance funds for the road and was concerned the school would be built before the road. Ms. Ayala clarified that the School District is not using its general ftmds to pay for infrastructure. The money would come from the school impact fees. If the funds for Pleasanton City Council 11 11/09/99 Minutes