My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110999
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN110999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
1/19/2000 11:32:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/9/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
east requires that the complete realigned Vineyard Avenue be built along with the sewer <br />line, etc. The Specific Plan does allow the western portion (Pan 1 ) to develop without <br />realigning the street or building a sewer lift station. If Council believes the realigned <br />street is necessary for any development on the west side, then the Specific Plan must be <br />amended. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti wanted assurance that once the property owners in the westem <br />portion have paid the infrastructure fees necessary, they would not be reassessed at a later <br />date for more fees. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said the approved 27 lots in the westem portion would be allowed to <br />proceed with an extension of the sewer line and water line and develop their lots. The <br />school is the key issue. If the School District proceeds with construction of the school, <br />then the fees collected from the western portion from the School District and from one or <br />two other projects in the corridor would be able to fund all the infrastructure for <br />realignment of the street, installation of bikeways and sidewalks, construct the sewer lift <br />station and necessary water improvements. <br /> <br />Mayor Tarver asked for the cost of realigning the road. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said the fees from the school, the western lots, and about two of the <br />remaining lots are combined, all of the infrastructure would be paid for without any one <br />property. owner paying significantly more than their pro rata share. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked the dollar value necessary to get the road realigned beyond <br />the school. What is the share of the two properties beyond the school to get just the road <br />constructed, not the sewer or water? He had understood that if the school is built, a road <br />is necessary. So what does it cost to get the road? He inquired whether an assessment <br />district could be formed without amending the Specific Plan. <br /> <br /> .Mr. Swift felt it depended on how the assessment district were structured. If all or <br />some of the property owners agreed to finance the infrastructure in advance, they could <br />do that without an amendment to the Specific Plan. That would allow them to pay for <br />improvements over a long period of time. The City has not favored this process for <br />residential developments. In this instance, because of the expense of forming an <br />assessment district, selling bonds, etc. and the relatively inexpensive improvements, he <br />believed there were other vehicles that would be preferred. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked what the School District is paying for the school site <br />property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift had no definite information, but had heard a figure of $180,000 per <br />acre. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala believed the School District would have the funds for building the <br />school and its share of infrastructure pursuant to the School Fee Impact Agreement. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />11/09/99 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.