My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051969
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1960-1969
>
1969
>
CCMIN051969
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:46:41 AM
Creation date
11/19/1999 11:59:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Appea! of the Shell pi,,1Co.~ 235 W. Mac Arthur,Blvd,%~ Oakl~nd.~ from a decision of <br />the Desi~n,,Review Boa[d..iq i~poSinS.Condit~ons, Nov, 2 and 16,upon the approval of a <br />~on~.g permit for the construction of an automobile service station at 5251 ~9~ <br />7ard Ro~d~ and.,.,requeSting c,!arifica'[ion Qf do~i~ion~ No.,21. ,23. and 25 of saff.d <br />Zonin~ Permit, <br /> Mr. Fales reported that he had received a letter, dated May 12, 1969, from Mr. <br />Per Perry, Real Estate Representative for Shell Oil Company, requesting that the <br />public hearing scheduled for this meeting be continued until the City Council <br />meeting of July 14, 1969. <br /> It was moved by Councilman Reid and seconded by Councilman Rega that the <br />public hearing on the Appeal of Shell Oil Company be continued until July 14,1969. <br />The roll call vote. wa~ as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid. Spiltotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />~ATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br />Report of the Planning....D~r.ector Re: P~liCy Re~ardi~ Amendments to Established <br />P.U.D.'s <br /> Mr. Castro summarized his report which included the past history of Planned <br />Unit Development in Pleasanton. He also explained the difference between PUD-i's <br />and PUD-2's and presented a policy recommendation which is contained in his repor~ <br />on this matter, dated May 15, 1969. <br /> After considerable discussion on this matter, it was moved by Councilman <br />Beratlis and seconded by Councilman Reid that the City Council meet in joint <br />study session with the Planning Commission in order to study this report in order <br />to establish a policy regarding amendments to established P.U.D.'s. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Getton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Fales was instructed to schedule this joint meeting. <br /> <br />SPECIAL REPORTS <br /> There were no special reports scheduled for this meeting. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIQNS <br />~eport of the Plannin~ CommissiOn Re.; Application of Amador Valley Investors to <br />amend existin~ P.U~D. 69-2.,pertainiBm.to a portion of Parcels 2-6 and 6-2, <br />Assessor's Map Book No. 946, BloC~.ll~I, ~aid properties containing a~Drox!~a.t.ely <br />11.0 acres <br /> Mr. Castro presented drawings of this tract which Droposed a Common Green <br />concept with garages facing a 30' wide alley. <br /> Considerable discussion ensued regarding the maintenance of this alley and <br />of the common greens. <br /> Mr. Castro stated that the Subdivision Committee recommended approval of this <br />P.U.D. amendment with modifications and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution <br />No. 890, approving the preliminary development plan for this P.U.D., but the Plan- <br />ning Department is basically opposed to the conceptual modification of a P.U.D. <br />after it has been approved and begun. <br /> After additional discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reid and seconded by <br />Councilman Rega that this matter be continued after a study session and also after <br />the Councilmen have had sufficient time to visit other cities where this concept <br />has been developed. <br />'The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Getton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Oakes, representingAmador Valley Investors, stated that he approved of <br />this continuance as he had just received cost estimates from his architect x~ich <br />were prohibitive and would not be able to develope this P.U.D. concept at this <br />time. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.