CCMIN032469 - Laserfiche WebLink

3 Councilman Betaills pointed out the fact that the homes within this PUD Dis- trict were Just slightly less than the lower priced homes in some of the subdivi- sions now under construction. Mr. Green, Redberry Court, Pleasanton, stated that he was definitely opposed to this type of development. After a lengthy discussion regarding this matter, it was moved by Councilman Reid and seconded by Councilman Beratlis that the public hearing be closed. The roll call vgte...~a.s as follows: AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Getton NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Getton declared a recess at 10:20 P.M., and stated that the Council would discuss the appeal of D&V Builders, Inc., as soon as he reconvened the meeting. Mayor Getton reconvened the meeting at 10:35 P.M. Continued discussion ensued regarding density, traffic circulation, and the b~ fact that the cost of these homes are above the price that the $6,000.00 to ~'~ $9,000.00 per year salary earner can qualify for. Mr. Castro stated he, per- GO sonally, felt there are merits to the concept as presented by Mr Frost but had 'D ' L.) hoped that the price range would have been within reach of those families in the (.~ $6,000.00 to $9,O00.00 bracket. Mr. Castro stated that increase in the prices of the homes in Pleasanton are so drastically out of proportion to the increase in wages,and the amount of families unable to qualify for housing in this area will continue to expand upwards during the years to come. After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilman Spiliotopoulos and seconded by Mayor Getton that Resolution No. 69-61, granting the appeal of D&V Builders, Inc., and refer the matter to the Planning Commission with conditions listed by the City Attorney regarding prices, be adopted. .... The City Attorney stated that the City could not regulate the prices of these homes. Councilman Reid moved a stustitute motion which was seconded by Councilman Spiliotopoulos that Resolution No. 69-61, granting the appeal of D&V Builders in the matter of their application for preliminary Planned Unit Development approval to allow construction of single-family homes as noted under the preliminary development plans labeled "Garden Court Homes", to be located in an R-2 District generally situated easterly of Hopyard Road and northerly of Black Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The approval was given with the expressed understanding that the developer will be able to sell his product to persons in moderate income situations, i.e., $6,000.00 to $10,000.00 annual income; 2. The approval is subject to specific subdivision design approval by the Planning Commission; 3. The approval is subject to design review approval by the Design Review Board; 4. The approval is subject to the conditions contained in Recreation and Park Commission Resolution No. 69-4, dated February 3, 1969, regarding the proposed "mini-park" concept, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Getton NOES: Councilmen Beratlis and Rega ABSENT: None P~op~se~ Apnexation Designated Annexation No. 58 Mayor Getton declared the public hearing open. Mr. Fales reported that the Local Agency Formation Commission, at their meeting on March 20th, denied the application to expand Annexation No. 58, because they felt that Pleasanton's need to annex the added area at this time was not sufficient to justify the creation of an unincorporated island within the City Limits. Mr. Fales stated that in addition, and most important, is that consummation of the expanded annexation would have included a portion of Foothill Road upon which a considerable sum of money must be expended by 1972 in order to allow proper traffic circulation for the Stoneson regional shopping center. Mr. Fales also stated that he has received indications from Alameda County that Pleasanton's chances of re- ceiving direct County aid on this project would be much greater if this portion of Foothill Road were still in the County at the time these expenditures have to be made. Mr. Fales recommended consummation of the original Annexation No. 58. e