My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102069
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1960-1969
>
1969
>
CCMIN102069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:46:41 AM
Creation date
11/19/1999 11:44:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />305 <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilman Beratlis and seconded by Councilman Spiliotopoulos <br />that the appeal of Shell Oil Company be dismissed in accordance with the request of <br />Shell Oil Company by letter, dated October 15, 1969. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Receipt of public protests regarding the annexation of approx. 23 acres along <br />Vineyard Avenue, commonly known as Annexation No. 61 <br />Mayor Gerton declared the public hearing open. <br />Mr. Fales reported that this annexation involved only one individual, that <br />being the property owner, who had requested the annexation. <br />It was moved by Councilman Rega and seconded by Councilman Reid that the public <br />hearing be closed. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /><e::r <br />..... <br />00 It was moved by Councilman Rega and seconded by Councilman Beratlis that <br />~ Resolution No. 69-248, declaring no majority protest in the matter of Annexation <br />~ No. 61, be adopted. <br />U The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENI' : None <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilman Spiliotopoulos and seconded by Councilman Rega that <br />the reading of Ordinance No. 581, Annexation No. 61, be waived. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilman Spiliotopoulos and seconded by Councilman Rega that <br />Ordinance No. 581. Annexation No. 61. be introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Rega, Reid. Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Application of the Planning Commission for an amendment to Sec. 2.112 of Ord. No. <br />520 regarding front yard setback for storage of vehicles other than automobiles <br />Mayor Gerton declared the public hearing open. <br />Mr. Hirst reviewed the proposed ordinance and explained the description of a <br />front yard, as stated in Ordinance No. 520. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of the parking of one of the subject <br />type vehicles in front yards on lots where houses were built to the rear of the lot <br />or where houses were built in an "I}' shape with a portion of the front of the house <br />located well beyond the required 23 foot setback which would allow ample room to <br />park the subject vehciles in front. Mr. Castro stated that in accordance with the <br />description of "front yards" in the Zoning Ordinance, parking would be allowed in <br />situations listed above. as long as the required 23 feet setback was observed. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the screening in cases such as these. <br />It was moved by Councilman Reid and seconded by Councilman Beratlis that the <br />public hearing be closed. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis. Rega, Reid, Spiliotopoulos and Mayor Gerton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENl' : None <br /> <br />After continued discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reid and seconded by <br />Councilman Beratlis that the application of the Planning Commission for an amend- <br />ment to Section 2.112, Ordinance No. 520 regarding use of front yard setbacks of <br />storage of vehicles other than automobiles be referred back to the Planning Com- <br />mission for the inclusion of language in the subject section which would require <br />adequate screening of vehicles other than autos which are stored in front of a <br />residence but beyond the required front yard setback. <br /> <br />2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.