CCMIN061272 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Hirst reviewed the proposed ordinance. Mr. Sooby supplied information regarding the gravel truck traffic passing through Pleasanton. Mr. J.R. Bravo, representing the gravel companies, stated that the comp- anies were not aware of the fact that the public hearing was scheduled for this date until last Friday and asked that this matter be continued until they have sufficient time to make a presentation. Messrs. Hal Lollmann and Ralph Mitchell also asked that this public hear- ing be continued. Mr. Edgar recommended that the public hearing be closed and the Ordin- ance be introduced and time be granted for testimony from the grave1 companies prior to the action taken on this ordinance at the meeting of June 26, 1972. It was moved by Councilman Herlihy and seconded by Councilman Pearson that the public hearing be closed. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Ried NOES: None ABSENT: None It was then moved by Councilman Pearson and seconded by Councilman Mori that Ordinance No. 667, prohibiting the operation of certain vehicles in excess of certain weights upon certain streets within the City of Pleasanton, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Mayor Reid and seconded by Councilman Kinney that time be granted to the gravel industries to allow them to testify prior to the time that final action is taken on Ordinance No 667, on June 26th, 1972. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: None MATTERS CONTINUED' FOR DECISION Further consideration Re: Residential develqpment around the V.C.S.D. Sewage Treatment Plant (Final Map 3312) Mr. Edgar stated that this matter was continued from the meeting of last week at the request of the Singer Housing Company. Mr. Edgar, after presenting the background on this particular Tract, stated that the main consideration regarding residential development in the close vacinity of a sewage treatment plant, was. the question of order. He added that although the oder problem is not so severe as it was a year ago, he would recommend that this area be placed in ~a Study District and referred to the Planning Commission to be studied. from a land use point of view. 3. 6-12-72