My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052272
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
CCMIN052272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:47:28 AM
Creation date
11/18/1999 12:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cities who are in the Alameda County Library District. Mr. Edgar <br /> explained that the benefit of this would be that the cost to the <br /> cities in the district would be less as this ~Tould be spread over <br /> all cities. Mr. Edgar reported that the other recommendation the <br /> Library Commission has made is that, in order to maintain the curr- <br /> ent level of service~ the cities request a Library Tax Rate increase <br /> up to 3¢. <br /> <br /> Councilman Kinney explained that he has researched these matters and <br /> found themto be most important to Pleasanton, in view of the new lib- <br /> rary to be located at Amador Valley Community Park this year, and rec- <br /> ommended that this tax increase be supported. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Kinney and seconded by Councilman Herlihy <br /> that the City of Pleasanton request the ALameda County Board of Super- <br /> visors to fund the Local Government and Business Library from the <br /> Alameda County General Fund and to .increase the Alameda County Library <br /> Tax from 23 ¢ to 25 ¢. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote ~.las as follo~vs: <br /> <br /> AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br /> There were no reports from Boards and Commissions. <br /> <br /> REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br /> <br /> Report of the Director of Public Works Re: Speed Limit Reduction on <br /> Hopyard Road <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell reviewed his report, dated May 17, 1972, in which he <br /> indicate~:.tha~ ~t~le-spped limits now posted are adequate and are being <br /> complied ~,~ith, but because there is considerable public pressure to <br /> · reduce the spped on Hopyard Roa~ he would suggest the following reduc- <br /> tions: ..... <br /> <br /> 1. The existing 45 MPt] zone from Division St, to Valley Trails <br /> Drive North, with a 35 MPH zone, and to rezone from Valley <br /> Trails Drive North to Stoneridge Drive to 45MPH, leaving <br /> the open divided portion at 55 MPH from Stoneridge to <br /> the Freeway~ <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Kinney and seconded by Councilman Mori that <br /> Ordinance No. 664, reducing the speed limit on Hopyard Road as recomm- <br /> ended in the Report of the Director of Public Works, dated May 17, 1972, <br /> be introduced and adopted on an urgency basis. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid <br />NOES: None <br />......... ABSEN~: None <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Kinney and seconded by Councilman Mori <br /> that the reading of Ordinance No. 664, be waived. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> <br /> AYES: Councilmen. Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson and Mayor Reid <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 5 ~ 5-22-72 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.