CCMIN040372 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilman Gerton and seconded by Councilman Beratlis that Resolution No. 72-47, authorizing the appropriate City Officers to execute the agreement with Amador Valley Investors for the completion of Loma Alta Park, be adopted.' The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton, Pearson and .Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT:~ Councilman Spiliotopoulos Councilman Gerton, in behalf of the-Council, thanked Mr. Oakes for his assistance in the development of this park. Appeal of Humble Oil Compan~ from an~-~adverse decision of the Planning Commission in den~zin~ .Conditi'~nai~,~Use Pe~-~t? Appt?~i~t~on NO~. 71'10, .Re: Construction and operation of an Enco Service Stati6~-on-'.the~ South&ast- eriy corner o~'-Hopya'~d.' Road 'an'd vAll'~"'~en~'e-,' in-a Nei~hborhdod Comm- ercial Distrfct. ~ Mr. Edgar reviewed the above matter' and'then read a letter' from ,Mr. Ted Lannin opposing the construction and operation of,a service' station at this particular location. After some discussion regarding the lservice,station study, it' was moved by Councilman Pearson and seconded hy Mayor Reid to refer this matter to the Planning Commission for further review. The roll, call vote was as -follows: AYES: Councilmen Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES:, Councilme~ Beratlis and Gerton ABSENT: Councilman Spiliotopoulos Mr. Michael Hemp, operator of the Shell Station in the subject area, requested that the City Council wait until a later time to make a .decision on, the Enco Station. It was moved by Councilman Beratlis and seconded .byi =Councilman Gerton that the appeal.of Humble oil .Company be approved. The roll Icall vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen .Beratlis and Gerton NOES: 'Councilman Pearson and Mayor, Reid ABSENT: Councilman= Spiliotopoulos Mr. Edgar announced that this matter will,~be heard,'con~u~rently with the report from the Planning Commission. * Councilman Spiliotopoulos,. Joined the Council at 9,'.15 P.M. Further.' Report Re.: General Plan. Review Mr. Edgar reviewed the scope-of work' to be ~co~'eted by= .!the . firm of Livingston and Blayney for the Genera~ Plan Review. Councilman Pearson stated that he would only favor the contract if it were not binding on the new council and if it would be subject to change if the City gets an agreement on a valley-wideI~General Plan. Councilman Gerton stated that the City's General P~an.needs reviewing now and can't wait for an agreement among P~easanton, Livermore, Valley Community Services District and Alameda County. 3. 4-3-72