CCMIN040372 - Laserfiche WebLink

of the lack of sewer capacity and the Ilack of 'a.specific phase-out program of the Sewer Treatment Plant on Su~oll~Boulevard. Mr. Bud Lake, representing Morrison Homes, requested that his company's property be given .a .-priority within the'Study.District and .be acted upon first. Mr. Herman Trudner, owner of property in the Mission Park area, stated that he felt his property"'shoutd-be omitted-from. the-Study District en- tirely, as he has an agreement for sewer ~capacity with the City. Mr. Charles Seymour, 492.San Gabriel Court, felt =that!alll the subject properties. should be placed in the Study District in order-to allow the Planning Commission to review densities and 1-and= use= as there were already too many multiples built and too much. property. already zoned for future multiples. There. being no further remarks from the public,..it.~as moved by Council- man Beratlis. and seconded by Councilman Pearson that=,~!the~puhlic hearing be closed. The roll. ,call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton, Pearson and Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Spiliotopoulos Councilman Gerton stated that he felt these properties should .all be rezoned to the Study District but also felt it was only equitable for the developers who have spent time and money .on planning should be given some priority =based upon how much work they have already done. After some discussion, it was moved by Councilman=Gerton and' ,seconded by Councilman Beratlis that Ordinance No. 658, amending the Zoning Map of the City of Pleasanton and amending Chapter 2 of Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton from RM-1500, RM.2500, RM-4000 Multi-Family District, the Planned Unit Development Districts, and the..Commercial District to the Study District for a Specified period of time-. be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton, Pearson anld'Mayor Reid NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Spiliotopoulos MATTERS CONTINUED FOR~ DECISION Application of the-Planning Commission Re:'. Proposed'~O~.din~nce of the Cit~ of 'Pleasanton amendfng.. Ch~p~e~ ~2' of Title ..~iI of .the Or'd~emce' Code ~. of the Cit~ of' Pleasanton b~ ~he addition 'theTet6"joE~Ar~i~Ule 13~5 pro- viding for an RMR, Multi-Family Res. identia~' 'O'v&~'~"aX~.fDfs.~t-.and for regulations ~'na 'requ. irements w-ith'-'T;.~eSpect-'- thereto .... Mr. Edgar requested that this matter be continued' fDr,discussion in 30 days. R. eport Re: .Agreement with Amador Valle~ InvestOrs ~re~.ar. din~. the comp- letion of Loma Alta Park. Mr. Edgar reviewed the above agreement which ~out~lined 'the' payment re- imbursement schedule to Amador Valley In'vestors. 2. 4-3-72