My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 88158
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
RES 88158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2012 3:59:46 PM
Creation date
12/4/1999 12:44:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/5/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
hour for the particular building (as employers have sought to meet the <br /> City's TSM goals by adjusting work hours). In addition, employee <br /> density differences and use differences cause large differences as <br /> well. <br /> <br />TSM Survey Results - The difficulties encountered in actual field <br />monitoring in selecting "typical" sites, plus the obvious shifted work <br />schedules in some -- led staff to believe that the only accurate way <br />to measure north Pleasanton experience "across-the board" would be to <br />field check every office-type building, a project too large to <br />undertake. Instead, staff chose to estimate peak hour traffic based <br />on the June TSM surveys supplied by every building and/or employer <br />with more than 50 employees. The response rate for these surveys is <br />very good (71% City wide) and the data can be assumed to be accurate. <br />A part of the survey asks the time of day employees leave work and the <br />travel modes used other than a single-occupant vehicle. The data can <br />be translated into outbound P.M. peak hour (4:30-5:30) trips by <br />adjusting the number of employees who state they usually leave at that <br />time to account for those using alternative travel modes and <br />accounting for those employees not submitting surveys. Total P.M. <br />peak hour trips are then derived by assuming outbound trips constitute <br />80% of total trips, an assumption currently made and generally <br />supported by ITE/Caltrans studies. Table 3 shows these results <br />compared to the field measurements. While not close in all cases to <br />the field measurements, the TSM numbers are based on actual responses. <br />Differences may be the result of daily fluctuations or increased TSM <br />practices since June 1987. <br /> <br />The individual site results from the TSM survey analysis are shown in <br />Table 4 and are represented graphically in Figures 1 and 2. Several <br />items are worth noting: <br /> <br /> 1. Single-story buildings built for "office/R&D" or "R&D/Lt. <br /> Manufacturing" generate traffic at rates equivalent to <br /> multi-story office buildings, 2.19 trips/1000 sq. ft. <br /> compared to 2.09 trips/1000 sq. ft., respectively. This is <br /> not surprising given the actual use of these facilities as <br /> offices. In fact, commercial brokers now refer to these <br /> product types as "office-flex" in recognition of their <br /> essential office usage. <br /> <br /> 2. The composite trip rate is 57% higher for "Office/R&D" and, <br /> 100% higher for "R&D/Lt. Manufacturing" uses than those <br /> currently found in the Standard Requirements. Rates for pure <br /> office uses are also higher, by 25%. <br /> <br />The results found in the TSM survey are not terribly surprising on <br />analysis. First, actual use of buildings built for less intensive <br />light manufacturing or R&D uses have been used as office and are <br />generating traffic like office uses. Second, some of the trip <br />reductions utilized by the present Standard Requirements are more <br />appropriate for the build-out traffic scenarios they were originally <br />developed for. For instance, transit usage is negligible today, as the <br />area is poorly served by transit. Carpooling currently falls short of <br />the level assumed, possibly because so many businesses are new to <br />Pleasanton. Indeed, given the relative lack of congestion in <br /> <br /> - 3 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.