Laserfiche WebLink
Recommended Distribution Assumptions <br /> <br /> Staff believes the best short-term indicator of P.M. peak hour trips <br /> for a new building (the most critical trips) is the place of residence <br /> of similar employees. Since most north Pleasanton traffic studies are <br /> for office-type uses, staff suggests using the 1987 place-of-residence <br /> destinations for the Hacienda Business Park-Meyer Center-Center <br /> Park-Pleasanton Park area for the trip distribution standards. <br /> <br /> As before, traffic studies for non-office-type uses may (and should) <br /> use a traffic engineer's best estimate of future distribution, after <br /> receiving approval from the City. <br /> <br /> TRIP GENEI~TION I~TE8 <br /> <br /> Present Assumptions <br /> <br />Table IV in the Standard Requirements, attached, sets forth the trip <br />generation rates used in traffic studies. Because office-type uses <br />are the most prevalent in north Pleasanton, the accuracy of estimating <br />their trip generation is the most critical. These are also the trip <br />rates which have historically been the most "adjusted" from standard <br />Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) or Caltrans recommended rates. <br />Staff has studied these uses this past year to establish a <br />Pleasanton-specific trip rate. <br /> <br />The rates for office uses, the primary use in north Pleasanton, have <br />been developed by TJKM for use in numerous traffic studies, both <br />short- and long-term. The key P.M. peak hour rate is a derived <br />number, beginning with an average daily traffic (ADT) rate generally <br />accepted by ITE and Caltrans, then adjusted for transit, car pooling, <br />local trips, and flextime. Office-type uses were differentiated <br />between "office," "Office/R&D," and "R&D/Light Manufacturing." The <br />assumed trip rates, with adjustments, are shown in Table 2. <br /> <br />Empirical Studies <br /> <br />Staff looked at the office-type buildings in north Pleasanton to <br />determine (i) whether the construction of a building was indicative of <br />its use, as assumed in the current traffic studies, and (ii) whether <br />the final P.M. peak hour trip rate was accurate. Staff did not <br />attempt to analyze individual "trip reduction factors" as estimated by <br />TJKM, since the only number that counts in short-term traffic studies <br />is the final trip rate. Staff used both driveway counts at several <br />representative north Pleasanton locations and an analysis of the TSM <br />survey results to review north Pleasanton trip rates. <br /> <br />Driveway Counts - Full-day driveway counts were taken in November 1987 <br />at seven locations, selected as representative sites with driveway <br />numbers and configurations capable of being monitored. Difficulties <br />in setting up the counters to yield in-bound and out-bound data led <br />staff to study only total trips. The results are shown in Table 3 <br />(one location, the Clorox facility, is not represented due to problems <br />in correlating the count data with building occupancy). These show <br />considerable variation, much of which relates to the fact that the <br />4:30-5:30 P.M. peak hour assumed in the TSM ordinance is not the peak <br /> <br /> - 2 - <br /> <br /> <br />