|
SPECIAL REPORT5
<br /> Cit7 Council Discussion Re~ ~'.J~:~w~!'zi~e~ F~.~:,,~-!~, ~,~l~-!~
<br /> Mr. Edgar s~ated ~han ~1, i av?~a~3~ ~a~e,-.~[~. h~t been fo~wa!ded to the Councilmen
<br /> regarding the November P~?~.s ~;~ ~,~
<br /> After discussion ~6ga~.di~, wh~.~r ~, ~.~ ~ Ck~y C~*~un~.~i~ should take a stand on
<br /> each Proposition, i~ wa~ z%-.~,~ bJ May~ Reid -~nd ~edonded by Councilman Kinney, that
<br /> this matter be continued ~:~ ~h-= ~n=~a~S .~,: ()~,~:.r~ber B0, i~97Z.
<br /> The roll call vote was as ~o!~..~s:
<br />' AYES: Councilmen Heri ih~, Kinne'~ 7~t~-i~ Pea?:-scn and ~yor Reid
<br /> NOES: None
<br /> ABSENT: None
<br />
<br /> REPORTS OF BOA~S AND CO~ISSiONS
<br /> There were no reporns ~f Boards ~c~J C~>;~n~~ p~resen~ed at this meeting.
<br />
<br /> REPORTS OF THE CiTY ~NAGER
<br /> Review of Bids recelved~_~y.~,t!i~,~%~L~C~jl~,t~,~.~3,~. i~one~id~Drive~ Project 72-5~
<br /> and Award oE Contract.
<br /> Mr~ Edgar presented ~,he ~e[~c~. ~ ~-~ ~i~.~7~j~L ~i ?~bl~c Works regarding this
<br /> matter, star ing that ~ N~Jga ~ ~ v,~, ~) --~ ~ ,~. ~ '~ i ~ ~, ~Ar~ d i. ng Env iI'onmental Impact Statement
<br /> was attached~
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Cct~n~ ~m,an M~: ~ ~,~! ~.~',~,~t~,~de,f~ by Counc~l. man Pearson, that Resolu-
<br /> tion No. 72-174, finding ~h~t ~L~ ~,~L ~t ~,~.~!~ ,~ve ~o significant impact on en-
<br /> vtro~ent, award the con~'<~alt [,~,~- wa',?~ i~np~'.~emen~.s, Stoneridge Drive, Project
<br /> 72-5, to Silva's Pipel].,ne, ~,nc~,~ ~ ~'~ .~i~L ~>~ ~$67,5!j,~,00, be approved.
<br /> The roll call vote was as ~,c?l ~?~,~'
<br /> AYES: Councilmen Herl~hy~ K~n~e',:~ ~ .~, ~ears. on and Mayor Reid
<br /> NOES: None
<br /> ABSENT: None
<br />
<br /> Councilman Morj requesLed ri~'~t ~ 'ept. t~j~bili~y ~atement of the three low bidders
<br /> on any project be ~.ncluded i~ z~h~ reD~t~t ~ A-~.~a~d e~ Contract.
<br />
<br /> Matters for the inEo~mati~ ci t~'~e C~.J~ L
<br /> 1. Mr. Edgar presenled a men~or~nd~ ~,,~=T~ ~h~ Plre~to~ ol CoEunity Development
<br /> regarding f~ling cf inrzer~m ~r~en ~p,a~ plan as required by the State Resources
<br /> Agency~
<br />
<br /> 2. Mr. Edgar presented a fe?~.t ,~n R~ve~ue ~ar2~ng, sta~ing that the City's share
<br /> will be $68,000~00, whlcP~ i.~ ,~L~r,~$~<jc~=~,b~_~~ !ess than expected~ In this connec-
<br /> tion, jim Walker s~a~ed h~~ ~ad ~,=~t-~T,~d the League of California Cities in
<br /> order to ascertain the ~c~.c~. ~sed ~,~ Re~enue Sharing and why our share was
<br /> so small. The Les~7~oe w~.]~ ~+,~ ~e~-~-?% w~r~[k 5tote and Federal officials soon,
<br /> and will advise us ~e~~ ~,~t, ~.e~r~ ~,~,~ ~cheir findings,
<br />
<br /> 3. Mr. Edgar presented ~ msmc~r~',r~,~x~.~ :~,.~,~. ~he l>~ec~or o~ Co~unity Development
<br /> reporting on a Ccnfer,~ce h~~ a~e~'~c~ ~eF~rding Seismic Safety, Enviro~ental
<br /> Geology and Plannir~g, ~'~ ~ ~,~,~r~'~,,~.~?.~
<br />
<br /> 4. Mr. Edgar presented a re~{~;~ ~.~ Mr, By~Tii Pa~ness, Ci. ty Manager-Livemore,
<br /> regarding El Cb~c ~x~e~,-k~.~?~
<br />
<br /> 5. Mr. Camo'Deit prese~ed ;~;. ~?,,=~ ~:7~ ~elLa~t~g street lights on side streets.
<br /> He requested ~he C~n~ j ~ t<: v ~ ~w ~a ~rr~,po': ~ ~ '~ ,~t ree~ J~gh~ across from Hap ' s
<br /> on Neal Street, whi{~h h~i:~ ~ rw~,.-~,~-l~/~ >.Sh~.; ,~ i~,~.7 one over the sidewalk, and
<br /> a high one cn the sL~e~ ~;d~-,~ ~ ~ ~ '~-~:=~tL~-g Fu~poses at this time.
<br />
<br /> 6. Mr. Edgar presented ~ ,~,~:t~ ~:~r~ ~,~b~',:~t ~'~. ~r~nde!$ohn~ Chairman, Steering
<br /> Co~ittee for the P~/-]~>~/~ "K~=~,~--~-~!,~.~r;z) De,~cnst~ation, requesting an
<br /> official de]egaF-e l~cxn t~ ~'j~'y.~ ,~L~i ~-~.~$,a~%t~r) b~ appointed to the Action
<br /> Co~ittee~ aD a2~,tef~a~:~ ~e,~?.,-,re ~ a~:?~',~'~r~d t:o this Committee, and a
<br /> contribution <~f Si,5C0 (]~(:.~ ~::~=: ~ ~'~. :~g~[~,~-~ner~'at~:~n of St, age i o~ the Bay-
<br /> Delta Resour ces-R~c ~,~ ~:.~- ? i~:~:~.~ ~:; ~:: ~ ~ ~,: ~-
<br />
<br /> 10/9/72
<br />
<br />
<br />
|