CCMIN100873 - Laserfiche WebLink

6i After Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Kinney, and seconded by Councilman Mori, that Ordinance No. 713, approving the application of the Planning Commission to fezone from the O (Office) District to the P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) District that property of Pico Investors, Inc., described as Book 946, Page 2549, Parcels 1, 2 and 3, said property located south of Palomino Drive between Concord Avenue and Pico Avenue, containing 2.06 acres, more or less, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: -' AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, and Mori NOES: Councilman Reid and Mayor Pearson ABSENT: None Mayor Pearson recessed the meeting at 9:10 P.M. Mayor Pearson reconvened the meeting at 9:25 P.M. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Report o[ the Planning Commissio.n~ ~e: ..Warehouses in R. C. Johnson Property Mr. Edgar etated this matter had been continued from the meeting of September 24, 1973, for more detailed plans regarding sewage disposal requirements. Mr. Campbell presented the staff report and displayed drawings of the Holding Tank systems, which proposes four 3,000 gallon tanks each for four warehouses, and a 20,000 gallon capacity holding tank for one warehouse. Mayor Pearson suggested that the Holding Tank Policy and disposal of contents be finalized before any Holding Tank permits are granted. It was moved by Councilman Mori, and seconded by Councilman Kinney, that con- ceptual approval be granted for the Holding Tank system for a series of ware- houses on the R. C. Johnson property, not to exceed 12,000 gallons for four ware- houses and 20,000 gallons for one warehouse, and that it will be necessary to file notice of specific tenant with the Planning Commission and receive final permit for a specific Holding Tank from the City Council when such tenant is assured. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, and Mori NOES: Councilman Reid and Mayor Pearson SPECIAL REPORTS Further Report~ Re: Preserve Area Ridgelands as it relates to Alameda County recommendations to amend General Plan in the ridgelands Mr. Edgar stated this matter was continued from the meeting of October 1, 1973, for further study of the options proposed by Alameda County. Mr. Harris elaborated on the four alternatives, which are as follows: 1. Ratify existing County general plan as it pertains to the Pleasanton-Dublin Hill Area. That portion of the County General Plan between Foothill Road and the crest of the Pleasanton and main ridges presently reflects the land use shown on the existing Pleasanton General Plan, e.g. most of the area devoted to low density residential (2 dwelling units per gross acre) and slope conservation (1 dwelling unit per 2 gross acres). This gives the potential for 14,000 residents in the area. 2. Allow no further residential land uses in the hill area. 3. Develop only geologically stable lands of moderate slope (under 25% slope). This is the proposal which is closest to the recommendations of the Pleasan- ton Planning Staff and our Citizens Advisory Committee. It is also the alternative which is recommended by the County Planning Department. It would allow a total of about 20 additional dwelling units in the ridge area at full development. 4. Permit construction of a Skyline Highway along Pleasanton and Main Ridges. There are two alternatives to this proposal, one allowing residential uses 3. 10/8/73