Laserfiche WebLink
Further Report~ Re: Sewer Service Charge Increase <br /> Mr. Edgar stated this item had been continued from the meeting of June 25th <br /> in order to present the Council with additional information regarding the V.C.S.D. <br /> rate increase. <br /> <br /> Mr. Walker presented the staff report which included the staff report submitted <br /> on June 25th, V.C.S.D. Ordinance No. 102 which establishes the Sewer Service <br /> Charge to be effective August 1, 1973, and the Income and Expense Estimate for <br /> V.C.S~D. Sewer operation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Scheidig presented a letter received from the Internal Revenue Service <br /> regarding the validity of the V.C.S.D. rate increasec He informed the Council <br /> that until the interim price freeze was removed, either by its termination on <br /> August 13th or the implementation of Phase IV, neither V~C.S.D. nor Pleasanton <br /> may increase its fees above those in existence prior to the freeze~ <br /> <br /> Councilman Kinney expressed his concern regarding the use of funds by V.C.S.D. <br /> which would be received from Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Reid, and seconded by Councilman Herlihy, that <br />Ordinance No. 701, amending Ordinance No. 695, be adopted as an urgency measure <br />with the effective date of the ordinance to be as of the time that said fee may <br />legally be charged. Councilman Reid indicated the urgency related to the obli- <br />gation by the City to pay a set service charge to Valley Community Services Dis- <br />trict pursuant to a 1967 Agreement and the V.C.S.D~ has increased its rates and <br />unless the City increased its rate to match that of V.C.S.D. the City's General <br />Fund would have to pay the difference. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Reid, and Mayor Pearson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />City Council Consideration~ Re: Joint Powers Agreement to implement the Water <br />Management Plan <br /> Mr. Scheidig presented his report and revised joint powers agreement, and <br />stated that the City Council should determine if they desire to proceed with a <br />Joint Exercise of Powers agreement to implement the Water Plan. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pearson stated this was an important issue and would be a long-range <br />program and should have full support of the Council. <br /> <br /> Councilman Herlthy commented that he would like to have the item tabled until <br />completion of negotiations with V.C.S.Do <br /> <br /> Councilman Mori stated that a decision should be made prior to October 1st at <br />which time it must be determined how to implement the Water Management Plan~ He <br />commented that the City Council had previously endorsed the concept of the Joint <br />Powers Agreement, after study by the Water Interest Committee to determine the <br />most expedient way to implement the Water Management Plan. <br /> <br /> Councilman Reid etated that an agency to implement the Water Plan must be <br />approached with a positive attitude with all parties , and he expressed concern <br />regarding the arbitration clause in the contract. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Mori, and seconded by Councilman Kinney, that the <br />City Council reaffirm their position supporting the concept of the Joint Exercise <br />of Powers Agreement between Livermore, V.C.S.D., and Pleasanton, to implement the <br />Water Management Plan in the Valley. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Kinney, Mori, Reid, and Mayor Pearson <br />NOES: Councilman Herlihy <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 4. 7/16/73 <br /> <br /> <br />