CCMIN102973 - Laserfiche WebLink

offered to $~ll the Ci=y she 1,000 GPM F~mper for $36,620o00 plus sales tax° The truck dDes meet ~he speci~i~;ations required by ~he Fire Department, Councilman Her]lhy and Mayor Pearson expressed concern ~egarding th~ reputation of the Boardman Company= Councilman Reid sta~ed he ielt bids should be scented in the normal process on this item~ The City Attorney indicated that %he City is not required to go to bid on this type of item~ It was moved by Councilman Kinney, and aeaonded b~ Councilman Morl, su~horizing the staff to accept the offer o~ the Boardman Company, O~lahoma C~y, Oklahoma, to buy the 1,000 GFMPumper at The roll call vote was as ~ollows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mcri, and Mayor Pearson NOES: Co~ncilman Reid ABSENT: None Approval of ~.te.~ Re: Master' Plan for ~air Mr. Edgar stated ~hat as a resul~ of a meeting en October 26, 1973, In Bill Fraley's office, Alameda County Planning Department, some tentative procedures that would involve the City in the development plans ef the Alamed~ Cc. un~;y Fair- grounds were developed as follows: (1) The Fair will. provide ~he City with a conceptual plan for ~he ultimate development of the Fairgroundso The plan would include the street and utility system as sown on the Fair's Master Plan, but not specific uses or building locations; (2) The Fair will provide a c. opy of the five year plan that is now required by the Sta~e each year, for the City's comment; (3) The County Public Works' Department will provide the City with copies of all Environmental Impact Reports prepared for all projects on the Fairgrounds, for the City's con~ent; and (4) The projects to be constructed on that par!~ of the Fairgrounds within ~he City, will be processed thro~gh the City Planning Commis- sion, for review and content. Mr~ Edgar requesCed approval of a letter written ~e Alameda Cc. unty Fairgrounds confirming these procedures~! Mr. Jim Bows, 6575 Pesos Santa Cruz, ~epresen=ing Del Prado Homeowners, stated that because of the p~oximity oi this Subdivision ~o the Fairgrounds, this Home- owners Associatios is vitally interest in any furthe~ deuelopment of the Fair- grounds and would appreciate being notified o~ an~ plans for such~ He was ad- vised that plans had ~!ot officially been presented as yet but his group would be kept apprised of such plans~ Mr~ ;Jim I~imingham, Co-Chairman of the Cit]zens Genera] Plan Review CDm~ittee, stated that this Comm1~tee had voted to urge %he ~air Association to disclose their proposed Master Pi~In be£o~e the City Council at a public hearing. The City Council authoEized the City Manager to send his letter to the Fair Association ~egarding tentative procedures in the developmen~ of the Fairgrounds. Repor_ttj~:___Am_bulanc_~e Service Fee Increase and Sab~siJ_ZAd_~ustment Mr, Edgar stated [hat the amount of money being requested over last year is the result o~ a contractual obligation as a result of ~he allowable profit given to the Ambulances Company, and that based upon the Hospital analysis the ~ee structure should be increased thereby reducing the subsidy.~ Mr~ WalkerTM p~esen~ed the staff report reg~Edtng this matter, sta~ing that the ag,:eement between ~he three local public agencies and the Ambulance Company provides fore subsidy adjustment each year~. The subsidy from each local agency must be increased from $700~00 to $1,012~50pe~ month fo~ 1973-74. The Ambulance Company has asked fore fee increase to take place immediately so that the sub- sidy might be reduced in £ollowing years=> It was moved by Coancilman Kinney, and seconded by Councilman He~lihy, approving a modification to Exhibit B to allow the monthly subsidy paid Pleasanton to Allen's Ambulance Company be increased to $1,012~,50 as re- quired by the Agreement, and that the Ambulance Company be permitted to in-- crease their fee charges on Pick-up to $45.00, plus $2.00 per mile Mlleage Fee~ i0/29/~3