Laserfiche WebLink
suggested renovation and expansion of the Sunol Plant. He further suggested a <br />Task Force be established as a liaison b~twee~ the City, V.C.S.D., and the Water <br />Boards for better communications wi~b these agencies. He expressed concern re- <br />garding the amount of monies spent for consultant fees for studies. <br /> <br /> Mr. John Long, 3231 Vineyard Avenue, stated he felt there was really no <br />shortage of sewer plants in the Valley but the problem concerns hard water and <br />disposal o£ effluent. <br /> <br /> Mr. Robert Pearson, 3590 Churchill Court, expressed concern regarding the <br />excessive amount of funds spent for consultant fees to study alternatives to <br />the sewage treatment plant and stated he felt consolidation with V.C.S.D. <br />would be in the best interest of the community. He urged Gity Council to <br />consider building a new plant as a last alternative because of disposal of <br />effluent problem, and to reconsider expenditure of money for studies~ <br /> <br /> Mr. John Edmands, representing the Industrial Development Committee, stated <br />that at this juncture Pleasanton has had one hundred million dollars worth of <br />industrial requests come before the Committee but no sewer capacity is avail- <br />able for development, and the City is losing approximately $400,000. per year <br />in taxes because of this. He requested direction from the Council as to what <br />to tell prospective commercial developers regarding sewer connection. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mori thanked the former Mayors and the Industrial Development Commit- <br />tee for their presentation. The Mayor noted for the record that the consultant <br />costs were necessary because the Federal and State guidelines requires studies <br />of various alternatives in order to qualify for grant funding and City must <br />consider the two most viable projects which a~e: 1. An interceptor sewer line <br />from Sunol Plant to V.C.S.D., and 2. Construction of City's own plant. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> There were no reports of Boards and CommiSsions presented at this meeting. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER (Contd.) <br />Report., Re: Approval Of Plans and SpeSs., santaIRit~ .Road <br /> Mr. Sooby presented the staff report, dated June 6, 1974, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilwoman LeClaire, and seconded by Councilman Kinney, <br />approving plans and specifications on Santa Rita Road project at E1 Rancho <br />Motel, and authorization to call for bids. <br />The roll call vote was as fol!ow~:.. <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, CoUncilwoman LeClaire, Councilman Philcox, <br /> and Mayor Mori <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Report~ Re: Sub-Lease for Justice COurt Building <br /> Mr, Walker presented the staff report, dated June 3, 1974, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Kinney, and seconded by Councilman Philcox, that <br />Resolution No. 74-132, approving Sublease between County of Alameda and City of <br />Pleasanton for rental of the Pleasanton Justice Court Building in the amount of <br />$300,00 per month from July 1, 1974, through December 31, 1976, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Councilwoman LeClaire, Councilman Philcox, <br /> and Mayor Mori <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />~eport, Re: Implementation of Capital Improvement Pro.~ram <br /> Mr. Walker presented the staff report, dated June 7, 1974, regarding this <br />matter, listing time schedule of various projects and consulting firms for <br />required consultant assistance. <br /> <br /> 6. 6/10/74 <br /> <br /> <br />