|
Councilwoman LeClaire reaffirmed her position in opposition to this matter,
<br /> expressing her concern regarding supervisorial Jurisdiction of the City over a
<br /> sewage plant so far away°
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Councilman Kinney, and seconded by Councilman Philcox, that
<br /> upon consideration of the Environmental Impact Report prepared by Alameda County
<br /> Planning Department, Alameda County, being the lead agenc7 in the approval of
<br /> the Apperson project, the City Council has reviewed those sections pertaining to
<br /> sewage treatment and disposal at the proposed Diamond A Ranch and is satisfied
<br /> that the Environmental Impact Report adequately deals with the question of sew-
<br /> age treatment and disposal, and further move that the City Council re-affirm
<br /> and re-execute an agreement between the City and William Apperson and Diamond
<br /> A Ranch, Inc., pertaining to the construction of and operation of a private
<br /> sewage treatment plant at the Diamond A Ranch.
<br /> The roll call vote was as follows:
<br /> AYES: Councilmen Kinney, Philcox, and Mayor Mori
<br /> NOES: Councilwoman LeClaire
<br /> ABSENT: Councilman Herlihy
<br />
<br /> ~epo.~t~ Re: Amendment to Garbage Ordinance
<br /> Mr. Scheidig presented his report dated August 5, 1974, regarding this
<br /> matter, stating that the City has recently been advised by the attorney for the
<br /> garbage franchisee that an amendment to the definition section of the Garbage
<br /> Ordinance is necessary in order to more clearly reflect the activities of
<br /> Pleasanton Garbage Service, Inc.
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Councilwoman LeClaire, and seconded by Councilman Philcox,
<br />that Ordinance No. 735, to be read by title only, waiving further reading
<br />thereof, amending Article 9 (Garbage), Chapter 2 (Special Permits), Title IV
<br />(Health, Safety, Moral and General Welfare), of the Ordinance Code of the City
<br />of Pleasanton pertaining to the definition of garbage, waste matter and refuse,
<br />be introduced°
<br /> The roll call vote was as follows:
<br /> AYES: Councilman Kinney, Councilwoman LeClaire, Councilman Philcox, and
<br /> Mayor Mori
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: Councilman Herlihy
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Councilwoman LeClaire, and seconded by Councilman Philcox,
<br />that Ordinance No. 736, to be read by title only and waiving further reading
<br />thereof, said ordinance being adopted as an urgency measure, amending Article 9
<br />(Garbage), Chapter 2 (Special Permits), Title IV (Health, Safety, Moral and
<br />General Welfare), of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton pertaining
<br />to the definition of garbate, waste matter and refuse, be introduced and adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilman Kinney, Councilwoman LeClaire, Councilman Philcox, and
<br /> Mayor Mori
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: Councilman Herlihy
<br />
<br />Report, Re: Regulation of Noise Amplification
<br /> Mr. Scheidig presented his report dated August 6, 1974, regarding this
<br />matter.
<br />
<br /> Mrs~ Jean Stauffer, 2339 Woodthrush Way, addressed the Council regarding
<br />her son's ice cream truck, stating that chimes are his only way of advertising
<br />his business, that he would be willing to lower the volume, and also not go on
<br />certain streets if requested not to do so. She urged that he son be allowed
<br />to continue the amplification of chimes for his ice cream business.
<br />
<br /> Discussion ensued regarding noise amplification and it was the consensus
<br />of the City Council to allow this type of advertisement at a reasonably low
<br />vo].ume.
<br />
<br /> 6. 8/12/74
<br />
<br />
<br />
|