|
1
<br />
<br /> The following persons spoke in £avor ef the application:
<br />
<br /> Kevin Hogan, 632 Sherry Lane, Danvi!le
<br /> Sally Edgerton, Walnut Creek
<br />
<br /> No one spoke in opposition co the application
<br />... Mayor Kinney declared the public hearing closed.
<br />
<br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Philcox, and seconded by Mayor
<br /> Kinney, that an ordinance amending Section 2-7~08a, Article 8 (c-Commercial Dis-
<br /> tricts), Chapter 2 (Zoning), Title I! (Zoning and Development), of the Ordinance
<br /> C6de of the City of Pleasanton relating to permitted and conditional uses, be
<br /> introduced°
<br /> The roll call vote was as follows:
<br /> AYES: Councilmember Philcox and Mayor Kinney
<br /> NOES: Councilmembers Herlihy, LoCiairs, and McLain
<br /> ABSENT: None
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Councilmember LeClaire, and seconded by Councilmember Herlthy,
<br /> that Resolution No, 75-195, to deny the application of the City Council for an
<br /> amendment to Section 2-7o08a, Article 8, Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code
<br /> of the City of Pleasanton, to allow picture framing shops as a permitted use in
<br /> the C-S (Commercial Service) District, be adopted.
<br /> The roll call vote was as £ollows:
<br /> AYES: Councilmembers Herlihy, LoCiairs, and McLain
<br /> NOES: Councilmember Philcox and Mayor Kinney
<br /> ABSENT: None
<br />
<br /> Appeal to the decision of the Board of Ad3ustment in d~yin~ the request of Dennis
<br /> Stuart for a variance to Section 2-5°35 of Article 3~ Chapter 2~ Title !I of the
<br /> Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanto~ to allow the retention of a carport
<br />_ which encroaches into the required frontyard setback of property at 1536 Mendoza
<br /> Court~ zonin~ foE the propert7 being R-1-6500 (Single Family Residential) District
<br /> Mr. Harris presented his report dated September 2, 1975, regarding this matter.
<br />
<br /> Mayor Kinney declared the public hearing open.
<br />
<br /> Mr. Dennis Stuart stated he had made a mistake in measuring from the curb line
<br /> and didn't didcover the error until inspection of the completed carport structure.
<br /> He added the structure did not affect the health, safety, and welfare of the
<br /> neighborhood and, therefore, was not a nuisance° He presented a petition, signed
<br /> by all fifteen residents oE the Court, stating they did not object to the carport.
<br /> Mr, Stuart added that reconstruction of this structure would be very costly, and
<br /> requested approval of his variance°
<br />
<br /> No one in the audience spoke in opposition to the appeal.
<br />
<br /> Mayor' Kinney declared the public hearing closed.
<br />
<br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Herlihy, and seconded by
<br /> Councilmember McLain, that Resolution No. 75-196, approving the appeal to the
<br /> decision of the Board of Adjustment in denying the request of Dennis Stuart for
<br /> a variance to Section 2-5°35 of Article 3, Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance
<br /> Code of the City of Pleasanton, tc allow the retention of a carport which en-
<br /> croaches into the required frontyard setback of property at 1536 Mendoze Court;
<br /> zoning for the property being R-1-6500 (Single Family Residential) District, be
<br /> '~ adopted,
<br /> The roll call vote was as ~oiiows:
<br /> AYES: Councilmembers Herlihy, LeClaire, McLain, and Philcox
<br />. NOES: Mayor Kinney
<br /> ABSENT: None
<br />
<br /> Councilmember McLain suggested the timing of the building inspection on
<br /> structures such as carports be changed, in order to eliminate mistakes at the
<br /> beginning of a project, Mr, Edgar explained the inspection procedures used
<br /> by the City.
<br />
<br /> 3o 9/8/75
<br />
<br />
<br />
|