CCMIN050978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Application of Merle Telford for design review for a commercial complex to be located at 201 Main Street innnediatelX north of the old Post Office Building; ~oning for the property is C-C/C-O (Central Commercial/Civic Overlay) District Mr. Chris Beratlis, 425 Main Street, representing the applicant, stated the possibility of installing sprinkler systems in the two proposed buildings had been investigated and it was not feasibly economical for such an installa- tion. He stated he had also checked with his insurance agency on this matter, and he determined the risk was relatively small on this type of structure. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that Resolution No. 78-119, determining, on the basis of a review of initial envtrornnental study done for this project, that no significant Cit ' environmental impact would occur as outlined in the y s guidelines and that a Negative Delcaration is appropriate for a commercial complex to be located at 201 Main Street, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Butler, Kephart, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 78-120, approving the application of Merle Telford for design review for a commercial complex to be located at 201 Main Street imme- diately north of the old Post Office Building; zoning for the property is C-C/C-O (Central Commercial/Civic Overlay) District, with Condition #5 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1634 clarified as recommended by the Director of Planning and Community Development, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Butler, Kephart, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENq': None XATTERS CONTINYED FOR DECISION Adoption of Ordinance No. 851~ for a planned unit development for a medium density residential development comprising ~!S_ingle family, zero-lot line__ homes similar to the existing Oakhill development, on a 12 acre site, loca.ted between Alder Court and Lemonwood Way al0~g..the extension of Muirwood Drive (Introduced .on April 25~ 1978, by a 4-1 vote) )~yor Mercer stated this ordinance ~as introduced on April 25, 1978, by a 4-1 vote, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. Mr. F2rris informed Council that the City's records were unclear as to the existing zoning on the subject property. Mr. Levine advised Council that the ordinance should be re-introduced to clear up the record, showing the property rezoned from Agricultural or R-1-6500 to the PUD District. Mr. Fred Falender, applicant, stated he agreed to the change and re-intro- duction of the ordinance. Councilmember Brandes stated he would again vote No on this matter as he was opposed to any development on the East side of Muirwood Drive included in this application. 6. 5/9/78