CCMIN022378 - Laserfiche WebLink

The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, Mercer, and Mayor Philcox NOES: None ABSENT: None Decide how flexibility in allocating units up to the total should be included It was moved by CounCilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that the City Council will have flexibility to go up to and including 15% above, in allocating units, depending on the type of project presented, and including a five year time span in proportion to the 2% growth rate. The roll call vote was as follo~zs: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, Mercer, and Mayor Philcox NOES: None ABSENT: None Decide which projects should be exempt It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that projects exempt from the selection process would be (1) the subsidized housing special allocation developments; (2) individual single family lots; (3) minor subdivisions (four or fewer lots which would become "individual single family lots" and be eligible for the yearly allocation for such lots); (4) sub- divisions creating lots with a minimum lot size of 20 acres (which would become individual single family lots); and (5) single family lots not served by the public sewerage system (which would need no approval beyond the existing City Council approval of such development). The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, Mercer, and Mayor Philcox NOES: None ABSENT: None Decide what development steps must be concluded to be eligible It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember LeClaire, that in order to be eligible for the Growth Management Plan selection process, non-exempt proposals would have to have reached certain levels of plan "finaliza- tion" in the development approval process, depending upon the type of project, including Planned Unit Development approval, design review approval, and comple- tion of a preliminary subdivision map; tentative or final map approval would not be required, and existing City approving bodies would retain their existing powers and authority over development proposals. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, Mercer, and Mayor Philcox NOES: None ABSENT: None Decide whether development approvals are assignable It was moved by Councilmember Herlihy, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, determining that development approvals are assignable. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, Mercer, and Mayor Philcox NOES: None ABSENT: None Decide whether approvals should lapse It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that approvals would lapse after a one and one-half (1½) year period in accord- ance with Page 9, Section 2-13.07(j) of the Draft Ordinance - 4th Draft, 9-1-77. 2. 2/23/78