CCMIN101478 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Bill Block, owner of property at Mohr and Martin Avenues, stated he was opposed to annexation to the City but favored five acre parcels. Mr. A1 Wimpkin, Trenery Drive, stated he had no objection to five acre lot parcels but did object to annexing to the City. Mrs. Fern Corley, 3744 Trenery Drive, stated she felt this area was a part of Pleasanton and should be annexed to the City. Mr. A1 Massa, owner of five acres on Trenery Drive, stated he was basically in favor of annexation. Mr. Brown stated that the recommended answer to question 3, page 2, of his report should be corrected to read: "The City of Pleasanton does not have annexa- tion fees. An annexation would require an EIR which presumably is handled by the LAFCO. Subsequent to annexation and upon development, the usual fees for building permits, etc., would be levied including park dedication fees and the new residential construction tax". Mayor Mercer stated he was not opposed to five acre parcels for the area in question but felt that since the County was providing adequate services that the City should not consider annexation at this time since Proposition 13 revenues were still uncertain. Councilmember Brandes stated he strongly favored this area being annexed to Pleasanton since the City already provided some of the municipal services. He stated there was a need for large lot parcels and he felt that 2~ acre lots should be considered as well as five acre lots. He suggested a meeting be scheduled with the property owners to get their opinion on annexation and to explain to them the benefits that would be received by annexation. l,fr. Levine reviewed the annexation process for Council and public information. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that the City ~nager be authorized to respond to questions of the Board of Supervisors as set forth in his report dated October 18, 1978, with the correction as noted on question 3. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Kephart, and Wood NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: Councilman Butler It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, instructing staff to pursue the matter of annexation with the property owners. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Kephart, and Wood NOES: Mayor >Iercer ABSENT: Councilman Butler Approval of LAV]~ Minutes Mr. Broom presented his report dated November 2, 1978, regarding this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, author- izing the regular Pleasanton representatives to LAVWMA, Mayor Mercer and Vice Mayor Brandes, to approve or correct the LAVWMAMinutes for August, September, and October. 8. 11/14/78