CCMIN100378 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUBLIC HEARINGS Application of H. C. Elliott~ .Inc., for PUD development .pla~ approval with regard to a fourteen acre site between Tawny and Palomino Drives immediately east of Pico Avenue - six and nine-tenths acres is p.~.oposed for residential townhouse develop- ment and seven and one-tenth acres is proposed as aneig.hborhood shoppin~ center. A negative declaration of environmental impact will also be considered (Continued Open from 8-29-78) Mr~ Harris presented his report dated August 22, 1978, regarding this matter. He stated that H. C. Elliott, Inc., was proposing a minor modification to the development plan changing the shape of the commercial buildings slightly but not changing the square footage. Councilmember Brandes stated that since the City Council meeting of August 29, 1978, he had met with representatives of tI. C. Elliott, Inc., and his concerns had been alleviated regarding various problems associated with Elliott's previous development. tie stated he felt H. C. Elliott was acting in good faith to solve the ~roblems as expeditiously as possible, and that he was satisfied this would be dane. Councilmember Butler stated he had also met with H. C. Elliott, Inc., repre- sentatives and was satisfied that the developer was pursuing with the best efforts possible to solve problems created in their development. Y~yor Mercer declared the continued public hearing open on the negative declaration and the application. Harry Elliott, Jr., representing H. C. Elliott, Inc., addressed the previous concerns of the City Council on Elliott's present development and the steps being taken to correct these problems, which he felt would soon be entirely cleared up. Councilmember Brandes inquired as to the type of fence proposed between the shopping center and the townhouses. Mr. Frank Bellows, architect for the resi- dential portion of the development, stated this would be a 6 ft. high masonry ~all. He presented an architectural drawing showing location of commercial buildings, townhouses, masonry wall and landscaping~ Councilmember Brandes asked if the condition regarding limitation on delivery hours could be changed later if there was a problem with the times as specified. He was advised this could be done after proper notification and public hearing. Mrs. Barbara Deshler, 551 Malbec Court, representing Committee Against TexCoat, stated 'this group was not opposed to the proposed project but felt that TexCoat ohou ~ not be used on any future construction. Mr. Lewis Mangum, 872 Sylvaner Drive, expressed concern at the lack of City enforcement of the building inspection codes, for deficiencies in streets and sidewalks, and for increased traffic on Vineyard Avenue that will be generated by this project. tie reviewed the problem regarding termites in his front porch. Mr. Mangum stated he was not opposed to the proposed development but felt traffic circulation should be carefully considered. Council and staff discussion ensued regarding traffic on Vineyard Avenue, improvements to that street, and improvement of the intersection at Vineyard Aaenue and Pico. 3. 10/3/78